Jump to content

Talk:BMW Z4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hi i have currently made a new exotic car site here. I was wanting to add the relevant pages to relevant wiki pages and wondering if thats ok to do so? Please let me know.

Thanks

Richard


I added a link for a FREE, non-advertising forum for Z owners that was removed as it was advertising. The site is http://www.zed-cars.eu This site is a FREE site.


Linking to forums is considered bad practice per Wikipedia:External_links. I personally disagree with this policy, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
While I'm in here, it should also be noted that it's good practice to sign your talk page edits, per Wikipedia:Discussion.
Stephen Hui 14:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for more input

[edit]

To date there are many revisions for the BMW Z4 (2003,2004,2005,2006,2007), would appreciate if someone could give an extensive review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by K3ith (talkcontribs) 02:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I have addressed the new 2010 E89 Z4. However, more information, from either the current or other sources, should be added.Quiwok Kemic Dec. 13, 2008

I have listed 3 sources, one being the official US press release, that say 2009. It's for the 2009 model year. roguegeek (talk·cont) 20:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone know just yet if the E89 will have an M model or is that one still a long ways off? Space Turbo (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

It might be worth noting that it is called Zee 4 in some english speaking places and Zed 4 in others. There might be more slang names.Geo8rge (talk) 19:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC) i would like to put a request in to say can we have the wheel coads for the cars on here as well please thank you :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.33.162 (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New models

[edit]

Someone needs to add about the new Z4M which is currently being designed and is expected to have the 4.0 v8 from the new M3 put in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.205.212 (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is supposedly a 2.0 litre V4 engine coming out soon as well (I heard today at the local dealer.) Any more details? --212.71.89.63 (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There will be no V4 engine, only an R4 Turbo. And the v8 from the M3 is to high for the Z4.Stef9580 (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

turbos

[edit]

what turbos are equipped on the new z4? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.64.236 (talk) 02:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iPhone app

[edit]

What sources do you want? Stef9580 (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BMW Z4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]