Talk:Beautiful Garbage/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- In general, this looks very good. Citations, stability, NPOV, and breadth of coverage are all good. Images are all fair use, and I think the fair use rationales are appropriate.
- The "World tour" section has some issues with tense. At time it sounds like you're writing as if the tour is ongoing.
- "Critical reception" has the same problem in places. ("He adds" rather than "he added," for example.)
- There are some one-sentence paragraphs in the last section that could probably be combined.
- Coemgenus, all three done. Lapadite (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- I made a few more minor changes, but I think there's nothing else that needs fixing. Great article, I'm happy to promote it. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Coemgenus, all three done. Lapadite (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)