Jump to content

Talk:Bobby Darling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thank God the article is back

[edit]

If the actor had done so many movies ... for heavens sake don't delete the article again.. Just because you don't like the actor doesn't mean that he is any less important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.105.145 (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

seriously man

[edit]

If he were American, now way his article would have been deleted... Wikipedia is dominated by western world and they keep deleting Indian articles... How could they know about such people... Even Baba Sehgal's article was deleted so many times... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.222.205 (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

[edit]

The editor of the article is as confused as the sexuality of Bobby Darling.

In an interview to a private news channel on 10 August 2009, after the episode of Sach Ka Samna, on being asked about her crush and love life she answered to have a big crush on Rahul Gandhi and expressed her true love for him. She further pleaded Rahul to consider her proposal for marriage and to accept her as his life partner.

She was also offered the famous "rakhi ka swayamvar" show before Rakhi Sawant. There might be a show called "bobby darling ka swayamvar".

The article moves freely from he to she to he.

heeheeheee.

Introspection Is The Answer

[edit]

C'mon people, don't be ridiculous. Rather than using the topic in question as a pretext for flaming Westerners, give a moment's thought to why the article was deleted in the first place, and you'll find the reason obvious.

This is not an article. This is an abomination.

It is an almost incoherent, tabloid-like account of abysmal quality masquerading as an information page which, I must say, closely resembles the gushings of a not-so-bright admirer.

If people do feel so strongly about Wikipedia featuring information on this particular individual, I invite anybody with even a little amount of knowledge on the subject to go ahead and perform a complete rewrite. Produce a stub, but by Thunder, blast this insulting piece of pseudo-information off anywhere it can see the light of day.

--Tshloab (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answering Mine Own Call

[edit]

I couldn't bear to see a page in such squalid condition on the hallowed grounds of Wikipedia. Therefore, I took it upon myself to carry out essentially what can be considered a deep cleansing.

As I haven't an iota of knowledge on the subject, all I could do was try to decipher what was splattered here earlier, and translate it from pidgin to a more widely accessible dialect.

So, while this and countless other such articles still leave a lot to be desired, I can, knowing that I've done all that I could've done for the situation, breathe easy. For now, at least.

--Tshloab (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Acting career section obviously paraphrased from this site, so removed.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bobby Darling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]