Talk:Critique of political economy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critique of political economy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Social and political / Continental / Modern Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Continental philosophy Modern philosophy

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Hi, I just noticed that on the sidebar, some works I have never heard of are listed alongside the works of Marx and Engels. These works are titled "Time, Labor, and Social Domination" and "Disassembling Capital." Neither work has a Wikipedia page for it, and only one of the works' authors is listed under "people": "Nicole Pepperell," who also has no Wikipedia page. I am not sure if it is appropriate for these works to be listed alongside foundational texts in the Marxian critique of political economy, as they are obscure works with equally obscure authors. I suspect that there may not have been the greatest of motivations behind adding them in the first place, but I am not sure whether it is appropriate to remove them either. Mbarcy (talk) 20:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was a disruptive editor on this page last year, and this may have been some of their contributions. I suggest removal. SPECIFICO talk 01:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marx, on the contrary, argued that labor is fundamental to social relations, and the section says that labor is NOT the source of all wealth. Limiteder (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]