Jump to content

Talk:Francesco Caracciolo-class battleship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleFrancesco Caracciolo-class battleship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starFrancesco Caracciolo-class battleship is part of the Battleships of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 24, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2013Good article nomineeListed
September 11, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
December 12, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
February 29, 2020Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Class name

[edit]

Conway's gives the name as simply "Caracciolo-class", and I believe Jane's does as well. Is the "full ship name" or the "shortened name" the more common one? - The Bushranger One ping only 19:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stille's Italian Battleships of World War II, Whitley's Battleships of World War II, Garzke's & Dulin's Axis and Neural Battleships of World War II, and Jane's Jane's Battleships of the 20th Century all use the full name. Parsecboy (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's good enough for me. I will now go shake a stick at Conway's for being very silly! - The Bushranger One ping only 19:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP worthy?

[edit]

How on earth did a skimpy 15K article get to be a FP? That's nowhere near long enough to get an adequate coverage. Another FP on Italian battleships that only had 3 ships in it is twice as long: Conte di Cavour-class battleship SMH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.13.227 (talk) 01:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere at WP:FAC establishes that articles must be 50K long. (CC) Tbhotch 01:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to note that the class with the article "twice as long" was...um...actually built. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]