Talk:Isotopes of niobium

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elements: Isotopes Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of niobium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the table 109Nb has two decay branches representing 69+69=138% of the total number of decays.150.227.15.253 (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If so, this should be indicated in the table. 2A04:CEC0:1011:B1F1:C5E3:F416:5CD7:1B03 (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is already settled. Note that "trace" is also what is written in the page p-nuclei. 14.52.231.91 (talk) 00:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that positron emission is (almost) impossible. From here, we know that the maximum beta plus energy of ⁹²Nb is 2005.9 keV, but the spin of ⁹²Nb is 7⁺, so beta plus decay would be impossible except to the 4⁺ state of ⁹²Zr with an energy of 1495.46 keV above the ground state. The decay schema of ⁹²Nb confirms this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.166.228.86 (talk) 13:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]