Jump to content

Talk:James Thin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inverness

[edit]

James Thin were once the largest and most scholarly bookshop in Inverness. They were taken over by Ottakers which then became Waterstones. The defunct Borders took over as the largest bookshop in Inverness until its recent liquidation. The largest bookshop in Inverness is now Leakeys, a second-hand book emporium.

Location of Flagship Store

[edit]

I have a James Thin bookmark. It lists 53-59 South Bridge not Infirmary Street as its flagship location. I know they meet but not sure if the later should be used to describe the location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.114.1.184 (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Thin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two separate articles here?

[edit]

I would like to do some work on improving this article, and in particular raising it above "stub" status. But before doing so, I would appreciate the views of other interested editors.

It seems to me that the article covers two distinct subjects:

  • James Thin, the business; and
  • James Thin, the man who founded the business.

Although most of the material is about the business, this is interspersed with some biographical details about the man. The lead is particularly confusing, as it refers to James Thin as a bookseller and stationer - clearly relating to the man - but also as a publishing company.

So, should we split this into two separate articles? A lot of information has been published about James Thin the man, so there should be no difficulty in finding references. I haven't yet looked for published information about the company (the existing references are not particularly useful), but would expect to find something.

Any views? Mike Marchmont (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two separate articles - Done

[edit]

Following my previous comment (see above), I have now expanded this article, with the focus on the book-selling company, which existed from 1848 to 2002. I have added substantial new material, with citations. I have also now published a separate article on James Thin the person, who lived from 1824 to 1915, and who was notable for more than being a bookseller.Mike Marchmont (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]