Jump to content

Talk:Lady & Peebles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady & Peebles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 01:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Gen. Quon (Talk)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn  01:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


1: Well-written

Check for WP:LEAD:

  1. Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  Done
  2. Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  Done
  3. Check for Introductory text:  Done
    • Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):  Done
      • Major Point 1: Plot "The series follows the adventures of Finn (voiced by Jeremy Shada), a human boy, and his best friend and adoptive brother Jake ... has trapped them and wishes to marry Bubblegum." (not a concise summary of the Plot section, it ends abruptly at "wishes to marry Bubblegum")
      • Major Point 2: Production "The episode was written and storyboarded by Cole Sanchez and Rebecca Sugar, from a story by Patrick McHale, Kent Osborne, and Pendleton Ward." & ""Lady & Peebles" featured the return of Takei, ... Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem and the 2010 game Amnesia: The Dark Descent. " (summarised well in the lead)
      • Major Point 3: Reception " "Lady & Peebles" was watched by 2.754 million people and received largely positive critical attention." (not a concise summary of the Reception section)
    • Check for Relative emphasis:  Done
      • Major Point 1: Plot "The series follows the adventures of Finn (voiced by Jeremy Shada), a human boy, and his best friend and adoptive brother Jake ... has trapped them and wishes to marry Bubblegum." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
      • Major Point 2: Production "The episode was written and storyboarded by Cole Sanchez and Rebecca Sugar, from a story by Patrick McHale, Kent Osborne, and Pendleton Ward." & ""Lady & Peebles" featured the return of Takei, ... Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem and the 2010 game Amnesia: The Dark Descent. " (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
      • Major Point 3: Reception " "Lady & Peebles" was watched by 2.754 million people and received largely positive critical attention." (the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body)
    • Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):  Done
      • Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):  Done
        • "Lady & Peebles" is the nineteenth episode of the fourth season of the American animated television series Adventure Time. (Lady & Peebles should be in bold)
      • Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):  Done
      • Check for Proper names and titles:  Done
      • Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None
      • Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None
      • Check for Pronunciation: None
      • Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):  Done
      • Check for Biographies: NA
      • Check for Organisms: NA
  4. Check for Biographies of living persons: NA
  5. Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  Done
    • Check for Non-English titles:
    • Check for Usage in first sentence:
    • Check for Separate section usage:
  6. Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  Done
  7. Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None
 Done

Check for WP:LAYOUT:  Done

  1. Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  Done
    • Check for Headings and sections:  Done
    • Check for Section templates and summary style:  Done
    • Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):  Done
  2. Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  Done
    • Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):  Done
    • Check for Works or publications:  Done
    • Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO): None
    • Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):  Done
    • Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER): None
    • Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL): None
    • Check for Links to sister projects: None
    • Check for Navigation templates:  Done
  3. Check for Formatting:  Done
    • Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):  Done
    • Check for Links:  Done
    • Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):  Done
 Done

Check for WP:WTW:  Done

  1. Check for Words that may introduce bias:  Done
    • Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):  Done
    • Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):  Done
    • Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):  Done
    • Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):  Done
    • Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):  Done
    • Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):  Done
  2. Check for Expressions that lack precision:  Done
    • Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):  Done
    • Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):  Done
    • Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):  Done
    • Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None
  3. Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  Done

Check for WP:MOSFICT:  Done

  1. Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  Done
    • Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):  Done
    • Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):  Done
None

2: Verifiable with no original research

 Done

Check for WP:RS:  Done

Cross-checked with other GAs: Adventure Time, Adventure Time (pilot), Adventure Time (season 1), Adventure Time (season 2), Adventure Time (season 3), Adventure Time (season 4), Adventure Time (season 5). Referred one pending FL for rough verification - List of Adventure Time episodes.

  1. Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (not contentious)  Done
    • Is it contentious?: No
    • Does the ref indeed support the material?:
  2. Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  Done
    • Who is the author?:
    • Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
    • What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
    • What else has the author published?:
    • Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
  3. Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  Done
  4. Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):
 Done

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:  Done

  1. Check for Direct quotations:  Done
    • "the valentine from Hell".[2] (Check on source 2, inaccessible)
    • "always welcome on this series, largely due to Takei’s delightful voice work."[3] (Check on source 3, successful, "Ice King’s anthropomorphized heart voiced by George Takei is always welcome on this series, largely due to Takei’s delightful voice work.")
    • "there’s a theatrical smarminess to his vocals that is a stark contrast to the Ice King’s nasality" ...[3] (Check on source 3, successful, "There’s a theatrical smarminess to his vocals that is a stark contrast to the Ice King’s nasality,")
    • "Takei always sounds like he’s having a great time reading the ridiculous lines that are written for him."[3] (Check on source 3, successful, "and Takei always sounds like he’s having a great time reading the ridiculous lines that are written for him. ")
    • "dominates this episode" ... [3] (Check on source 3, successful, "Princess Bubblegum dominates this episode, whether she’s shooting explosive rounds out of the Ball-Blam-Burgler-Ber or beating the shit out of Ricardio. ")
    • "episode reveals a side of her that we rarely see, and hopefully we’ll get more of badass PB in the future."[3] (Check on source 3, successful, "PB’s response: “You didn’t.” This episode reveals a side of her that we rarely see, and hopefully we’ll get more of badass PB in the future.")
    • "memorable" ... [10] (Check on source 10, inaccessible, subscription required)
    • "Storyboarding in an Animated Television/Broadcast Production" ... [11] (Check on source 11, successful, Storyboarding in an Animated Television/Broadcast Production ... Cole Sanchez, Rebecca Sugar ‘Adventure Time: Lady & Peebles’ – Cartoon Network Studios)
  2. Check for Likely to be challenged:  Done
  3. Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA
 Done
  1. Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  Done
  2. Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  Done
  3. Check for original images (WP:OI):  Done


3: Broad in its coverage

 Done

Cross-checked with other GAs: Adventure Time, Adventure Time (pilot), Adventure Time (season 1), Adventure Time (season 2), Adventure Time (season 3), Adventure Time (season 4), Adventure Time (season 5). Referred one pending FL for rough verification - List of Adventure Time episodes.

  1. Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:
    1. Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:
    2. Check for Out of scope:
  2. Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:
    1. Check for All material that is notable is covered:
    2. Check for All material that is referenced is covered:
    3. Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:
    4. Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:
    5. Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):
b. Focused:
 Done
  1. Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):
  2. Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):


4: Neutral

 Done

4. Fair representation without bias:  Done

  1. Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  2. Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  Done
  3. Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  Done
  4. Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  Done
  5. Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  Done
  6. Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  Done
  7. Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  8. Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  Done
  9. Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  Done
  10. Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  11. Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  Done
  12. Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None
  13. Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images  Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)

Images:
 Done

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Done

  1. Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  Done
    • Image 1 (George Takei by Gage Skidmore.jpg): This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. This version permits free use, including commercial use. Hence this image complies with The license must permit both commercial reuse and derivative works.
  2. Check for copyright status:  Done
    • Image 1 (George Takei by Gage Skidmore.jpg): Free.
  3. Check for non-free content (WP:NFC): None
  4. Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR): NA

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Done

  1. Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  Done
    • Image 1 (George Takei by Gage Skidmore.jpg): Relevant.
  2. Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE): None
  3. Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  Done
    • Caption: "The episode marked the return of George Takei as Ricardio." succinct and informative

As per the above checklist, the issues identified are :

  • The lead does not provide an accessible overview for the Plot and the Reception sections
  • The lead does not give relative emphasis to the Reception as is given in the body .
  • Lady & Peebles should be in bold in the first sentence of the lead .
  • 1a issue: "investigate an mysterious black ice cave" in the Plot .


This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm glad to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn  19:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. How do these edits look?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good. --Seabuckthorn  01:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn  01:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]