Talk:Orders of battle for the German attack on Vimy Ridge
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Orders of battle for the German attack on Vimy Ridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
[edit]The operation title should be in italics but it didn't work.Keith-264 (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
New header
[edit]@Vami IV: Shouldn't B class be showing on the article? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I goofed up assessing the article to B-Class standards. The only indicators of article quality that appear on the article itself are Good and Featured Articles. –Vami_IV✠ 15:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, you've re-assessed it from B to start. Keith-264 (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- What's wrong with B1? Keith-264 (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Imported discussion
[edit]@AustralianRupert: Orders of battle for the German Attack on Vimy Ridge, 21 May 1916 B1-3 recently downgraded, justified? Keith-264 (talk) 5:45 pm, 22 March 2018, last Thursday (2 days ago) (UTC+0)
- Just a query, but shouldn't this be assessed as a list? If it is, I'd argue that it is at least CL-class, if not very close to BL. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 1:06 am, Yesterday (UTC+0)
- I don't know, it's the first one I've done from scratch, what does it need for B? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 1:04 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)
- G'day, Keith, there are some good examples here: Category:BL-Class military history articles. Essentially, a decent lead that puts the list in context and summarises it, multiple elements that fully treat the topic, an image (or more) and citations for everything. As such, I feel it would be close to BL. Regards, AustralianRupert.
- I was thinking of something specific like the citations. Is (Data taken from Rogers The German Attack at Vimy Ridge [2010] pp. 46–47 unless indicated.) enough or should I cite each line? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- PS I couldn't find a better diagram for the infobox but i'll have another go. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- G'day, Keith, those citations seems fine. I have seen that method used before in lists. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- PS I couldn't find a better diagram for the infobox but i'll have another go. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- BL-Class military history articles
- BL-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- BL-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- BL-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- BL-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- BL-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- List-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- List-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- List-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages