Talk:Rajpal Yadav
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rajpal Yadav article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled
[edit]Although even a minor film actor is in a sense a public figure, a very minor criminal case is not sufficiently significant in their overall career to be a prominent part of a bio. DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- @DGG: Given that the subject just passes the borderline of notability so I think that comparing his notability with the coverage this criminal case has got, I think two sources are enough for a brief addition of that criminal case as this sort of Indian actors don't get much coverage. Although we can remove things on request by the subject if no one disagree but here I disagree as the article is full of his establishment. Sourced critism will balance the article. So, what you think @DGG should I add it? Both the sources are reliable. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 18:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- I already gave my opinion. He would be notable without it, and it's irrelevant to his career. For all I know, he thinks that any publicity is good publicity, but I think we have somewhat different standards. But I'm not abou to fight the issue. DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm going to add the content. Per our policy every contentious and negative material should be sourced. And here the content is sourced so I'm going to add it. Cheers, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 06:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- I already gave my opinion. He would be notable without it, and it's irrelevant to his career. For all I know, he thinks that any publicity is good publicity, but I think we have somewhat different standards. But I'm not abou to fight the issue. DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Mid-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Uttar Pradesh articles
- Mid-importance Uttar Pradesh articles
- C-Class Uttar Pradesh articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Uttar Pradesh articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles
- Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- C-Class Indian television articles
- Low-importance Indian television articles
- C-Class Indian television articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian television articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors