Talk:Sarcastaball
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Please do not add mention of pop cultural references, continuity notes, trivia, or who the targets of a given episode's parody are, without accompanying such material with an inline citation of a reliable, published, secondary source. Adding such material without such sources violates Wikipedia's policies pertaining to Verifiability, No Original Research, and Synthesis.
While a primary source (such as the episode itself, or a screencap or clip from it at South Park Studios) is acceptable for material that is merely descriptive, such as the synopsis, it is not enough to cite a primary source for material that constitutes analytic, evaluative or interpretative claims, such as cultural references in works of satire or parody, because in such cases, such claims are being made by the editor. This is called synthesis, which is a form of original research, and is not permitted on Wikipedia, regardless of whether one thinks the meaning of the reference is "obvious". Sources for such claims must be secondary sources in which reliable persons, such as TV critics or reviewers, explicitly mention the reference.
In addition, trivial information that is not salient or relevant enough to be incorporated into the major sections of an article should not be included, per WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE and WP:TRIVIA, and this includes the plot summary. As indicated by WP:TVPLOT, the plot summary is an overview of a work's main events, so avoid any minutiae that is not needed for a reader's understanding of the story's three fundamental elements: plot, characterization and theme. This includes such minutiae as scene-by-scene breakdowns, technical information or detailed explanations of individual gags or lines of dialogue.
If you're new to Wikipedia, please click on the wikilinked policy pages above to familiarize yourself with this site's policies and guidelines.
IGN Review is "wrong" due to being out-of-context
[edit]The comments pulled from IGN are from a Sarcastic paragraph and taken out-of-context in this wiki. Here is the full paragraph:
And how about Butters' Creamy Goo? That recurring joke was sooooo hysterical. I literally couldn't stop laughing, that's how funny I thought it was. I could hardly catch my breath. Matt Stone and Trey Parker deserve a round of applause -- check that -- two rounds of applause for discovering the key to comedy. What an original and delightful commentary -- such a breath of fresh air! Notice the use of "check that" as a tell tale that the reviewer really wasn't being serious here by referencing the SP Jim Rome joke. And the second paragraph begins: Okay, in all seriousness... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.171.247.91 (talk) 23:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- I know I'm really late here, but LOL. The review clearly uses heavy sarcasm (which is the running joke in the entire episode), yet it's referenced here as genuine praise. I tried to change it accordingly, so I hope it's better! Spitsonpuppies (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- No points taken off for lateness, Spits, since there's no time limit on Wikipedia. Thanks for catching my error (I missed the "Sooooooooo" in Nicholson's review, denoting the sarcasm), and improving the article. :-) Nightscream (talk) 03:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
CTE
[edit]this episode really has nothing to do with replacement officials, it is far more related to the 'concussion crisis' stemming from the large number of nfl players being diagnosed with cte, yet the article completely fails to mention this.
this article (at least the "this episode references" part) needs to be rewritten.
overwhelming evidence from google
evidence from southpark fandom wiki Snarevox (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Putting aside the fact that Google search merely list clips of the episode itself, or links to IMDB, and the fact that both IMDB and fan wikis are not considered reliable sources per WP:USERG (or for the matter, the fact that the only mentions of concussions on the wiki cites a page on South Park studios that appears to be dead), the article indeed mentions the concussion matter in the Lead section. Nightscream (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- Start-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- Start-Class Computer animation articles
- Unknown-importance Computer animation articles
- Computer animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- Start-Class National Football League articles
- Low-importance National Football League articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles
- Start-Class South Park articles
- Low-importance South Park articles
- South Park task force articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Episode coverage articles
- Low-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Unknown-importance American animation articles
- Start-Class American television articles
- Unknown-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- Start-Class Colorado articles
- Unknown-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles