Talk:The Boat Race 2008

The Boat Race 2008 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 16, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Boat Race 2014 was copied or moved into The Boat Race 2008 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

A fact from The Boat Race 2008 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the 2008 Boat Race featured the oldest ever competitor, a 36-year-old? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Boat Race 2008.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rowing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles To-do list: edit history watch purge Featured Articles: Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status. Get article relisted to 'good article status' Put through another round of peer review, see here Nominate for featured status Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave Stubs: see here.. Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them. Expand stubs to at least start class. Image requests: see here.. Article requests: see here.. Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates) Document FISA database errors University of Cambridge This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. River Thames (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's sport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 2008/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seattle (talk · contribs) 22:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll conduct this review. Seattle (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

• Files check out, etc. etc. etc.
  • Ta. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Mix of "The Boat Race Company Limited" and "The Boat Race Company"... etc. etc. etc.
  • Fixed. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Just my observation before reading the article......... but I don't remember reading a margin of victory of that large.
  • Just four years beforehand, the same winning margin for 2004, but noted. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Oxford were clear pre-race favourites don't particularly care for "clear" here. Would prefer you use a quote to explain what the author/source said, or if there's a specific margin, but I don't like just "clear", reeks of WP:PEACOCK
  • Removed "clear". The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you know when the last margin of victory was 6 lengths? That figure stuns me.
  • Per above, 2004. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Feel like I've seen Dowbiggin somewhere before, perhaps a note in the "background" section?
  • It's noted "Both coxes, Brodie and Dowbiggin, were former Blues..." already, was there any more you were looking for? The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• My last name is Monaghan! But on a serious note, the double-dagger in the footnotes doesn't have a corresponding double-dagger in the table, and one of the names is a typo (Monoaghan v. Monaghan).
  • Fixed, and annotated. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The sponsorship should be mentioned in the body because it's mentioned in the lead.
  • I don't like it in the lead, I've moved it into the main body and referenced it. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passable otherwise. Seattle (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• @Seattle: All addressed, many thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]