Jump to content

Talk:The Castafiore Emerald

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Castafiore Emerald has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2015Good article nomineeListed


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Castafiore Emerald/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 12:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Give me a few days on this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lede
  • "The book was considered " -by whom?
Reference provided in the "Critical Analysis" section. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marlinspike Hall -where is this, Belgium, England, Italy?
Technically in Belgium according to the book. I'll add a bit of information on it in the background section. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld:  Done. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Plot
  • "Tintin and Captain Haddock are walking through the countryside" -again, is this Belgian or English countryside?
As per the English version, it's the fictional English countryside of Marlinshire (i.e. like Hampshire, Worcestershire, Yorkshire etc.) — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
History
  • Tintin in Tibet, The Black Island, Tintin and the Picaros, The Adventures of Jo, Zette and Jocko. -Add years in brackets?
 Done Added. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per MOS avoid linking countries like Germany and United States
 Done Removed links. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Critical
  • Who are Jean-Marc Lofficier, Randy Lofficier and Harry Thompson?
Wrote about it in the Critical analysis section. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Excellent job, little to complain about for GA, Fram will appreciate the effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Thanks, Doc. My first Tintin GA! Yay! The credit also goes to Midnightblueowl (without whose initiative with Tintin articles I might have found the going difficult with this one.) and Prhartcom (For his deeply useful inputs and edits.) Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"fictional Maharajah of Gopal"

[edit]

fictional in the story? 142.163.195.153 (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]