Template talk:Wyoming

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Wyoming This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles This template is supported by WikiProject Wyoming.

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger ^{BLAH | SZ} 23:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just converted this box, and all other state boxes to a standard template. No information was lost in the transfer, and in fact a few problems were fixed (the old version used bullets, pipes, and spaces as delimiters, the new version sticks with just one choice: pipes). --CapitalR 04:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a particular reason why this template is aqua? Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by {{navbox}} to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY? Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color. I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, since there are no objections, I will change the color to the default. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]