User talk:Alossola
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Payés has been accepted
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists
[edit]Hi. Your edit [1] to this article broke the columns in the entry for Xhubleta. Could you rectify this please?
Additionally, doesn't it falsify the access date timestamps for all the URIs? Shouldn't they be updated to the date that you changed them all? --37.157.52.71 (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thx for pointing to Xhubleta - I corrected it.
- As for the timestamps, it's true that the old dates and the new urls won't stand an inquisitor's view, but there was no access either, as I used the analogy that I knew in a mass C&P action. Thus, (1) there is no true access-date, and (2) it would be hard to mend those hundreds(?) of references that I modified and exclude those that were correct before my fix. Sorry to have overlooked that. What is better now, (a) correct links and wrong dates, or (b) correct dates and a plethora of outdated links? Alossola (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)