User talk:Brythonic

Welcome!

Hello, Brythonic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —Perceval 02:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manichaean paranoia

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Manichaean paranoia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Perceval 02:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walden University

Your references to the alleged controversies in Walden are a little thin. I'm not sure that they support your text. For example, the reference supporting the proposition that Walden conferred degrees 20 years before they were accredited is not supported by the reference, perhaps you need to elaborate. Also, the U.S. World Report reference goes to a blank page, is that your intention. If so you need to elaborate by saying, for example, that they are not listed. The reference that purports to state that they refuse to report their graduation rates, etc. does not indicate that. Again, you need to be more specific unless you want these statements to be deleted.Mysteryquest (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wifey's World

I have reverted your addition to the article of their real names as consensus on the article was that their real names was not required at this time. Tabercil (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manichaean paranoia

First a personal reflection: while Zbigniew Brzezinski's notion of "Manichaean paranoia" was notable about the time he coined this highly political phrase, I must say that the article is unmaintainable because of the fundamental flaw in his phrase. Creating the article might have been justified, but it seems to me that it is obsolete today. Partake in the deletion discussion, but don't feel down just because our editing work here sometimes is ephemeral. Next heading announces the formal deletion discussion... ... said: Rursus (bork²) 13:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Manichaean paranoia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Manichaean paranoia meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manichaean paranoia (2nd nomination). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 13:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]