Jump to content

User talk:Nephiliskos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To the visitors of my discussion page! Welcome!
Da rulez:

  • You want something from me? Then visit my discussion page and start your talk right here - not elsewhere in the deep space of the wiki-universe. Be so keen and confront me face-to-face. I don't bite (not as long as you don't want it, that is...)
  • You disagree with an edit I made, or think I made a mistake or questionable emendation? No problem, just contact me here and leave an diff-link that leads me directly to the discussion page. I will try to respond ASAP.
  • I made a decision, a revert or some article change you disagree with? Then TALK with me about it! I'm just a human, just like you, and as such, I can do mistakes, too. Let's have a smooth talk and you'll see: it gonna be all ok in the end.
  • Nuisances, bawlers, vandals, rabbles and insult dispatchers are so out of business here. My discussion page is not Speaker's corner, no colosseum, no punch and judy show and no catwalk for know-alls. Hurt egos, divas and bitches may also depart at once. Bye.

Phrase of the month

  • The higher you rise, the deeper you fall.

Contests

[edit]

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nephiliskos,

I just happened to read your article on Sneferka. I make you kindly notice that I never wrote anything about him/her. The Kemet pages (80-85) that you also mention are dedicated to the architecture of the OK. Can you please correct that mistake? I already received two messages asking me further explanation about what appears in the entry.

I would be very indebted to you if you can do something ASAP.

Thank you very much and all my Best Wishes

Francesco Tiradritti — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.116.151.52 (talk) 05:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confused now, because at your archaeological website you DO mention Sneferka - you even dedicate the whole page to him. And you do mention a possible reading as "Neferkaes", proposing a role as a ruling queen: In my opinion, the presence of at least one serekh without falcon and a possible different reading of the name as NeferKaes (Nefer-Ka-s: cf. the female personal name Int-Ka-s (Djoser's daughter) or the 1st king of Vth Dyn. Userkaf) might hint at a further reigning queen rather than an ephemeral king, as it can be read as the last sentence of the entry.
So, how comes that you now claim to have "never wrote something about him/her"? Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 11:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nephiliskos: i think you confuse Francesco Tiradritti with Francesco Raffaele. At least the link you provide, is to the website of Francesco Raffaele. best wishes -- Udimu (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh!!! Then I should correct the entry with lightning speed! Thanks! Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Nephiliskos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

[edit]
Hello, Nephiliskos. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.A. Parrot (talk) 23:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nephiliskos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]