User talk:RP88/Archive 8
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 14 |
Talkback
![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 04:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Faizan Al-Badri -Let's talk! 04:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Crossing Lines character descriptions
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you removed part of the character descriptions for Crossing Lines. Would you mind if I added them back, along with descriptions for the other characters? I find it is helpful for television series articles to have more than just bare bones cast entries.—DocWatson42 (talk) 05:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please, feel free to make any modifications you feel will improve the article. —RP88 (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. ^_^ —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi! I'd like to thank you for your contributions to the Apple SoC related articles! Nice to have some help with a keen sense of detail and an excellent tool for filling out refecense links :D -- Henriok (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, it was kind of you to leave a note. I generally don't use a tool, I do it by hand because I want to actually visit the references myself to confirm the facts and check that the link is still good. If you're looking for a tool, I've seen editors using Reflinks, although given the number of times I've had to clean up after a user who used Reflinks, it probably has some bugs. —RP88 (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Prosperous Suzhou) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Prosperous Suzhou, RP88!
Wikipedia editor Noian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello, thanks for the article on Chinese Art. Please note that just because you have sources for what the art piece is and that it was on display, this by itself does not establish notability. Please fix this if possible.
To reply, leave a comment on Noian's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
- I'm not saying that it's not notable, I'm saying the page doesn't make any assertions of notability. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Which now after your edits, it does, so the tag removal is correct. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article Noian. —RP88 (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Which now after your edits, it does, so the tag removal is correct. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 14 |