User talk:Rasmus Hartwich

Hello Rasmus Hartwich,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  15:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is really promotional, no evidence of notability, and text copied from http://youtube.wikia.com/wiki/Royal_Order_of_the_Holy_Mackerel (although that is free content under CC-BY-SA)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —gdfusion (talk|contrib) 21:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Meters (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Copy-paste of your question and my response from my talk page) Okay man, listen! I'm 14 years old and live in Denmark, I speak perfectly good english, but the phrase: "speedy deletion-advertising" and "speedy deletion-significance" makes no sense to me. I don't know what they mean, but I can assure you 'The Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel' is both a real and loved YouTube channel. This was going to my surprise for Douglas (the creator) and hopefully I would then become 'Member of the Month'! I have a LOT to work on that I have not yet writen (Like the Secret Oath and Membership Roster) and I would appreciate if you could explain to me what the problem is, and what I have to do to fix it! I used to write this page on another page (for YouTubers only) but their Source Mode was way to hard for me, so I changed to you and your flowless system. Please get back to me, and reconsider your choise! I am sure we can figure this out, and come to agreements. Thank you for reconsidering, -Rasmus Hartwich — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmus Hartwich (talk • contribs) 16:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rasmus Hartwich. Even though the YouTube channel may be real and loved it has not yet received enough attention to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please see A7. No indication of importance and G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion for more information.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  05:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]