Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austria women's national under-19 floorball team
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 14:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Austria women's national under-19 floorball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence could be found that this is a notable youth team, getting attention beyond routine couverage. Fram (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Lovely to see how one of thew worlds highest ranking international youth floorball teams is non-notable and routine... Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 20:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- "One of the workds highest ranking" or one of the only one in the world? It is ranked 15 out of 19, big deal (or it was in May 2016, the ranking hasn't even been updated since). Does it have any notability or is this just WP:ILIKEIT? Fram (talk) 06:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh666 08:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh666 08:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Merely routine coverage, no indicia of notability. Montanabw(talk) 02:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - can't think of any way of improving this article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.