Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardboard Heroes Champions Set 3: Enemies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cardboard Heroes. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cardboard Heroes Champions Set 3: Enemies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Usually, I redirect articles where I can only find the one review already in the article and nothing else, to the company that made these. However, this one is so obscure, and the single review is from the company that produced the miniatures in the first place, that even a redirect would be too much honour. Utterly and completely non notable. Fram (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Given the single reference for reception, I'd prefer to see this merged somewhere, maybe to the SJG company? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The single ref is from the company, so that's hardly a reason to keep it anywhere. This is a set of cardboard figures, one of many, many products produced by the company. Thuis would be comparable to an article about BMW gloves or similar merchandise, produced by BMW and only discussed in the BMW company magazine; we wouldn't want to merge that to the BMW article either. Fram (talk) 07:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, there is only coverage from the games creator which notifies the game's existance but little else. As a result there is nothing to suggest this topic is notable. WP:GNG applies. Agree with comments from Fram, merging the content would be akin to merging an article about branded merchandise to the brand page. Not really what we would do. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Cardboard Heroes, since it is essentially an extension of the line by the same game company. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - With respect to User:Fram's argument that the subject fails notability so badly it does not earn a redirect, I am agnostic. With products that are older than Wikipedia, I'm usually inclined to be generous, although my glance over 'What links here' reveals no interesting links to the page. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect per WP:CHEAP. Hobit (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Cardboard Heroes. An obvious merge target for this stubby contribution which is unlikely to grow much further. SpinningSpark 23:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.