Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eeeee Eee Eeee
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Eeeee Eee Eeee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
i don't believe that notability has been firmly established, and i am suspicious of self promotion and feigned notability. Theserialcomma (talk) 23:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Wikipedia:Notability_(books) criteria, I don't see how his books are notable enough in themselves to deserve individual articles; delete/merge all Tao Lin books into author's article. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this book. Joe Chill (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete external links and references are mostly dead ends or links to blogs, author sites, etc. small press author with no significant mainstream or reliable alternative coverage. we should play ths straight by the book and delete any and all content related to this author that is not properly sourced.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, though I must admit to being mildly intrigued at the thought of a book titled after dolphin noises that alludes to Schopenhauer. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment, as the nominator, i am obviously voting delete. however, i also agree with jamie that we should "delete/merge all Tao Lin books into author's article".
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.