Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hohak Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. --W.marsh 02:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet notability criteria for bands Amcfreely 01:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. EdGl 01:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not satisfy WP:MUSIC. --Kinu 01:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. Google yields 191 results; the first page is mostly Wikipedia and its mirrors. Royboycrashfan 02:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TheRingess 06:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 07:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Prodego ^talk 14:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —This user has left wikipedia 18:50 2006-02-05
• Delete as above.Blnguyen 05:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and rewrite. Labor Exchange Band, which contributed some members to Hohak band is notable--Golden Song appears to be a legitimate and significant award. Therefore, does pass WP:MUSIC. Bad ideas 06:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Yet another tiny, non-notable band that doesn't really warrant an article. --Wingsandsword 09:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per "Bad ideas" Lyo 04:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Bad Ideas or merge with previous band. Kappa 03:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also passes WP:MUSIC by being reviewed in the Taipei Times: [1]. Kappa 03:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- Pierremenard 08:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and rewrite. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.