Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janina Wissler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Janina Wissler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. No reliable sources and nothing to indicate subject is notable enough for own article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Still Neutral~~ I tend to agree that none of the references are reliable, but an argument could probably be made that since there are ten of them that that qualifies as significant coverage per WP:GNG...though I'd argue that they're not reliable sources independent of the subject.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Go Phightins! (talk • contribs) 19:31, 1 September 2012

Very Weak Keep per morbid. Go Phightins! (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ^Chat_Online 14:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are enough sources in the Google News link to support a biography. Two seem to focus on her but I don't speak German.[1][2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE and even WP:PORN. Qworty (talk) 20:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Morbidtoughts, multiple coverage on Google News articles including Offenbach-Post and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung that definitely are reliable sources. If we should apply WP:PORNBIO she would surely pass the third criterium for her apparitions on music videos and mainstream TV programs. Maybe borderline, but IMHO notable. Cavarrone (talk) 04:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.