Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty Marie

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. --Haham hanuka 08:36, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Necromancing began this VfD on 26 July 2005. Unfortunately, the procedure wasn't followed precisely, thus I am rectifying this. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 02:17, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as non-notable --Necromancing 02:13, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hardly notable at this time. Google search using "Kitty Marie" (note quotes) shows only 35,300 hits; imdb lists 23 movies while iafd lists 67. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 02:17, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable. Quale 03:37, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Breaks my heart, but she doesn't seem particularily recognizable. Ashmodai 08:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep and expand. IMDB entry, borderline at best. JamesBurns 10:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. One day , next week or in a year , i want to prove something about a porn star named Marie. Is that Kitty? or Kelly? or Kathy? or Kristi? or or or? ... Even bad articles on no-names ( but with 35000 hits !!) are useful. MutterErde 09:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. And you will have about 600,000 other online resources to find info about whichever pornstar or adult model you are researching. This is not Porncyclopedia. Considering the staggering number of pornstars, nude models, and adult "actresses" that have or will exist, I think a pretty high bar of notability is needed to be considered for inclusion here. For example, Kristi Myst (VfD below) seems to have been able to move into non-porno entertainment, which is relatively rare, and her involvement in pro wrestling has raised her notability greatly. Kitty Marie has done nothing like this. Soundguy99 15:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are arguing against the inclusion of pornography-related topics in general. Porn actresses can have a high notability for their career alone. For example, in Germany Gina Wild and Dolly Buster were widely known (even by those who did not watch their flics) even before they retired from the porn industry. Regardless of that pornography is its own field of interest and thus porn actresses needn't be known much outside that field, just as most computing and physics theories are not known much outside their fields. I'd wager more people know about various porn actresses than about the theories of quantum physics. Ashmodai 05:25, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - [1] --Haham hanuka 14:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.