Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 warships and spacecraft
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 08:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 warships and spacecraft[edit]
- List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 warships and spacecraft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N and is just all Plot info filled with WP:FANCRUFT. If someone wants to transwiki this to wikia thats fine but wikipedia is not a fan site. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia articles are WP:NOT#PLOT or summary-only descriptions of fictional works. Needs something to provide context, namely why this thing is notable. But without reliable third party sources, it's impossible to WP:verify notability, so it's impossible to meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:45, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per Shooterwalker. Unencyclopedic. Jucchan (talk) 01:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced plot dump that fails to demonstrate any notability. Also an indiscriminate list.Folken de Fanel (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.