Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mainstream Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 06:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable re-issue label. Just a catalog listing. Andrew Levine 09:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Andrew Levine 09:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article is a stub now, but I'm glad that someone is re-issuing these recordings. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 10:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a stub to expand. Nickieee 07:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 00:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep—It is indeed just a catalog listing—that it is short does not make it non-notable—a quick review of google indicates it has sufficient "throw" to make it a valid entry. But the author (or some other kind soul) needs to beef this article up. Williamborg (Bill) 01:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — I see no notablility here. A Google search reveals almost no info about the subject, spare an inactive address American Patriot 1776 02:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Per Toronto. Vice President In Charge Of Office Supplies 03:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Alvin6226 ^talk 04:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but it needs expanding. Korinkami 11:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Williamborg, record labels don't reissue recording from the likes of Billie Holiday willy-nilly. RFerreira 19:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Certain Billie Holiday recordings are public domain in certain jurisdictions, so you do in fact see them being re-issued often. Andrew Levine 20:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The link at the bottom just allows you to send an email. How do you know that this label "reissues recordings from the likes of Billie Holiday" in any meaningful way? Lots of those budget CD labels do issue "willy-nilly" old radio broadcasts (or other poor quality stuff that is easy and cheap for them to get) of famous people. How is WP:V met for any of this information? GBYork 20:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait.... you're angry about an email link and a lack of references? That doesn't sound much like deletion criteria.... The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 01:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.