Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nati Frinj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Natimuk. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nati Frinj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

4hits on gnews, three of them abc. Not needed when everything in this article is already covered in Natimuk. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 03:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Extremely short and doesn't have any sources besides of the website that goes to a wayback machine of the apparent event website that is totally blank. Candeadly (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checked again and I looked at the wrong date, and there is many versions of the website on the wayback machine, but regardless, not enough. Candeadly (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Until reliable sources exist or can be found. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 04:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ABC is a reliable source. But agree that notability is questionable. LibStar (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete article as is is {{db-event}}, but most importantly a BEFORE shows there is neither the quality nor the quantity of sourcing needed. Star Mississippi 02:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC) ETA also fine with a redirect. Star Mississippi 04:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant coverage to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Natimuk - GA Melbourne (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Natimuk per GA Melbourne; as the nom says everything on the article is covered there. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Natimuk per GA Melbourne; InterstellarGamer12321. Cabrils (talk) 03:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.