Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation: Novgorod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tannhäuser (board game)#Expansions. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operation: Novgorod

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is only a mere sentence based on a product that is discussed in greater detail on the page it is directed from: Tannhäuser (board game), which itself is a topic that doesn't require extensive detail to warrant a separate article being insufficient notability. The original is currently undergoing an expansion that includes it. Stabby Joe (talk) 19:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination fixed for above user and listed on the log for the 25th. lifebaka++ 16:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE: Non-notable "expansion" of a board game. Very little content (none of encyclopedic value) and zero sources. Very little hope that sources will be found to establish notability, or that the article content can be augmented to the point where it has sufficient encyclopedic value. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 08:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to expansions section in Tannhäuser (board_game). Redirects are cheap, reasonable search term. Hobit (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.