Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are now five Google hits for this (most seem to be misspellings of paradigm), not much of an edit history, and a contributor who seems to be adding nonsense to WP. The article looks like nonsense, and if nobody can verify this, it probably is nonsense. Gareth Hughes 20:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. I can find nothing that isn't a typo of paradigm. Even the one book that looked like it might have been real[1] is also a typo [2]. Mmmbeer 21:34, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fictitious or at best nn. Agentsoo 22:12, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--DNicholls 22:34, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete what Agentsoo said. --Etacar11 00:58, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn belief. JamesBurns 09:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, unnotable or hoax, pending evidence to the contrary. dab (ᛏ) 10:32, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.