Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poke (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to A Gamut of Games. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poke (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A non-notable game that appeared as one game in a book of games. Stephen 23:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Note: Splitting game from a bundled discussion. Tavix (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with A Gamut of Games —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empire3131 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Truncate first, then merge to A Gamut of Games. My gosh, let's have all the rules for every game that everyone has ever thought about playing, eh? Unschool 06:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to A Gamut of Games per above. MuZemike (talk) 19:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.