Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QNAP TS-101
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- QNAP TS-101 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable storage device; one of many made by QNAP, but nothing remarkable. QNAP itself is probably notable enough, but not this device. There's nothing about the company itself in here or else I'd move to QNAP Systems Inc. and trim to info about the company. (Company article has been speedily deleted four times, though.) TJRC (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment from nom; A couple things I should have mentioned in the nomination... 1) the article was PRODded as an advertisement in 2006; and the PROD was removed by the creating editor the same day (I added details on talk page). That's why I went to AfD rather than PRODding myself. 2) Although QNAP Systems Inc. has been speedily deleted 4 times, only two were related to lack of notability (A7); the other two were copyvios (G12), I'm guessing a copy-paste from the company web site. [1]. I don't know whether a well-written article on the company that properly asserted notability could get around the SPEEDY A7; I suspect that it could. TJRC (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The product verifiably exists, but nothing here shows lasting significance in history, technology, or culture of the kind that would make it an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The product isn't notable in itself, this is just an ad WP:NOTADVERTISING DavidTTTaylor (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.