Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUN SYSTEM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SUN SYSTEM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How-to-guide ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫_Hey^{it's me} 13:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly fails WP:NOT and I wouldn't be surprised if it also turned out to be a copyright violation. Pichpich (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOTGUIDE. Nothing here to salvage. Pburka (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete On WT:CSD, there has been a long-standing suggestion that we have an "unsalveagble WP:NOT violation" criteria. This is why! —Tom Morris (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A software instruction manual is not an encyclopedia article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOTMANUAL. Probable WP:SNOW. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTGUIDE This is nothing like an encyclopedia article.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 00:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.