Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takaya Hashi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Takaya Hashi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevant sources found in the article OR via Google search. Subject is not clearly acclaimed for anything in particular. No news coverage found, either. I believe the subject is non-notable. Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toki in FOTNS is a significant role, 49 episodes. Nothing else jumps out at a glance yet.SephyTheThird (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One significant role does not equate to notability. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it did, I'm posting information that is useful for the discussion, it isn't attached to a opinion on notability. At least not yet.SephyTheThird (talk) 09:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 08:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guillem is a main character role in Outlaw Star; he's the ship's computer. Other roles not so much. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 10:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toki (Group 2) is part of the supporting cast; and so is Gilliam (Outlaw Star, Group 2). --Sk8erPrince (talk) 10:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.