Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VF-19 Excalibur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| gossip _ 22:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VF-19 Excalibur[edit]

VF-19 Excalibur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability independent of Macross through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details and in-depth product details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. I am also nominating these articles with the same issues:

SV-51 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

VF-0 Phoenix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

VF-25 Messiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) TTN (talk) 18:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems like a lock for deletion or at best redirection. Abductive (reasoning) 20:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Possible but unlikely search terms. Not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.