Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 December 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 20 December 22 >

December 21[edit]

Category:Splatter anime and manga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category is entirely based on original research and not supported by reliable sources. —Farix (t | c) 22:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Far Eastern Games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I have recently moved the article base from the former Far Eastern Games title as most of the sources show the official and common name to be "Far Eastern Championship Games" from 1915 onwards. SFB 21:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Individual bulls[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A step too far. "Individual cattle" is plenty sufficient. The six members of this category are also in supercategory "individual cattle" which they shouldn't be in both. "Individual cattle" has 24 members including the six in this category. "Individual cattle" is plenty unique enough to categorize these entities, we don't need "Individual cattle named Dave" and so forth. Herostratus (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automatically? Anyway the boy cows are Individuals and (I assume) Category Bulls covers collections of bulls such as breeds. Herostratus (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2014 half marathons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Half marathons and Category:2014 in athletics (track and field). Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge also to Category:2014 in athletics (track and field). There are very few half marathons which are notable enough to merit a yearly article, making this a case of a small category with little chance of expansion, that also has only one article. SFB 17:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Documentary films about the Gallipoli Campaign[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Documentary films about World War I and Category:Films about the Gallipoli Campaign. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary subcategorization. Only has one entry. The mother category has 4. At this point this category isn't needed. ...William 16:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Barrages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Presuming (from the 2008 inclusion criteria) this is not a duplicate category of Category:Barrages (dam), it needs to be renamed to distinguish itself from all the other standard types of dam. As a consequence I'd suggest Category:Tidal barrages becomes a sub-category of Category:Barrages (dam), rather than the existing reverse set-up. Sionk (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional transgender and transsexual characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: do not rename, though a rename discussion for the top parent Category:Transgender and transsexual people could be helpful in establishing the appropriate terminology for categories in this tree. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 'Trans' basically covers the extent of the categories. For characters that are merely cross-dressers, the category name as-is doesn't cover them, either. Negative Hippie (talk) 14:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Romanian mountain resorts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per the spirit of WP:C1, an empty category. This only thing in this category is Category:Ski areas and resorts in Romania, and both of these categories share a common parent: Category:Resorts in Romania. We have successful category trees for hill stations in Southeast Asia and Yaylas in Turkey but I can't find any cultural equivalent in Romania, at least from online sources in English. Whatever the intent of this category, it's not aiding navigation in its current form. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notified the category creator and this discussion has been included in WikiProject Romania. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, there is actually a page in the category now, so I think this category should not be deleted but expanded apon by some user. Gug01 (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]
Looks like someone (not me) moved it back out again. The question is are there enough non-ski mountain resorts to make a viable sub-category of Category:Resorts in Romania?RevelationDirect (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support since in Europe mountain resorts coincide too much with ski areas and resorts anyway. I've compared it with the resorts categories in Austria and Germany and they only offer ski areas and resorts, spa resorts and sea resorts as three possible resort alternatives, but not mountain resorts. By the way, I would not oppose renaming ski areas and resorts into mountain resorts for all countries, though that should require a separate nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_December_21&oldid=1074812659"