Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 15

< July 14	July 16 >

July 15

Category:Astronomy image articles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Astronomy image articles to Category:Astrophotography

Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERLAPCAT, astronomy images are main subjects of astrophotography. The subcats would be part of the target category. Brandmeister^talk 21:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There seems to be a meaningful distinction between these two categories; Category:Astrophotography contains mainly articles about the process of astrophotography, whereas Category:Astronomy image articles contains articles about its results. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as topic–set distinction. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:48, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:India-related topics in the Philippines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:India-related topics in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Vague category. Could not find similar categories of "country1-related topics in country2". Sanglahi86 (talk) 20:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- The main article is a valid list, picking out Indian influence in the Philippines, but that does not mean we need a category for it. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the State Duma (Russian Federation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 20:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Members of the State Duma (Russian Federation) to Category:Members of the State Duma

Nominator's rationale: see main article State Duma. Gryffindor (talk) 19:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ambiguous, as we also have Category:Members of the State Duma (Russian Empire). Jevansen (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ambiguous with Category:Members of the State Duma (Russian Empire). Spokoyni (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, in category space we use disambiguators more often than in article space, for good reasons. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the National Assembly (Afghanistan)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Also keep the following which were tagged but not listed. – Fayenatic London 19:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming

Nominator's rationale: And by extent their subcategories. Looking through this category (and the one for upper houses, etc.), it seems that three different styles are used. Either "Members of [Legislature] (Country)", "Members of [Legislature] of [Country]" or "Members of the [Country legislature]". I.e. Category:Members of the Chamber of Deputies (Bolivia), Category:Members of the Chamber of Deputies of Chile, and Category:Members of the Württembergian Chamber of Deputies‎. All of these are fine ways of doing it, but they really should be standardized. I suggest "Members of [Legislature] of [Country]" but any of the other forms also work so long as they're consistent. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No to all of these. Gryffindor (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all the current names match the names of the articles on the legislative bodies, and I see no reason to deviate from that convention. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, maybe we first need to find consensus on a unified article title style. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! RevelationDirect (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose All The categories should blindly follow the main articles. This would be better as WP:RMs in the article space followed by WP:C2D speedy category renames if successful. - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unless "of [Country]" is part of the formal name of the assembly in question. Usually it will not be. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anti-Muslim sentiment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. The old category will be redirected. – Fayenatic London 14:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Anti-Muslim sentiment to Category:Anti-Islam sentiment

Nominator's rationale: Apparent duplicate and WP:OVERLAPCAT. Brandmeister^talk 13:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. There have been previous discussions in which it was argued that anti-Muslim is different (referring to ethnicity) than anti-Islam (referring to religion) but I never found that reasoning convincing. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Queensland floods

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 19:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Queensland floods to Category:Floods in Queensland

Nominator's rationale: For consistency with other similar categories. Steelkamp (talk) 06:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support renaming --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Victoria (Australia) floods

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 19:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Victoria (Australia) floods to Category:Floods in Victoria (Australia)

Nominator's rationale: For consistency with other similar categories. Steelkamp (talk) 06:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs about toys

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 16:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Songs about toys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Not a defining trait. Most of them just have "toys" in the title or are about other things and only mention toys in passing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. A striking example, quoting the songwriter of Mrs. Potato Head (song): "the whole visual I had in my head was the fact that you can pull toy pieces off the face and that could represent plastic surgery". Marcocapelle (talk) 06:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. And no "Toys in the Attic"? Shame. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another poorly-built "songs by topic" category. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Cheetah Girls video games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:The Cheetah Girls video games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT since other entries got merged. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to parents per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.