Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 9

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 23:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template with no navigation left. All targets except the main pageant article have been deleted. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 09:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPNI information now appears in Template:Authority control automatically updated by Wikidata, so this template is redundant and should be replaced by the authority control template. Gamaliel (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose – this template is used to provide text in the article, either inline or as a separate paragraph. This is quite a different function from the authority control template. Most importantly, it adds a reference; information like this should always be sourced. Wikidata is not an acceptable source for information in Wikipedia. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: It is hard to find the author abbreviation in the {{authority control}} bar, so it isn't an adequate substitute for the text created by {{botanist}}. — Eru·tuon 21:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - a powerful template that adds botanical authority text to a biography and adds an IPNI citation to references. The template itself is very compact. I don't see how {{Authority control}} replicates this functionality, being buried in a bar and not obvious to a regular reader. Declangi (talk) 23:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose : The wording of the template is clumsy and the use of a border gives it undue weight. The parameter 'border=0' takes care of the frame, but still places it on its own line - it needs to be changed to inline. If these changes are made I will gladly support retaining it. Paul venter (talk) 10:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul venter: |inline=yes makes it inline. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Can the wording be changed?...... Paul venter (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul venter: perhaps you could explain how you think it should be changed at Template talk:Botanist. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For example 'The abbreviation xxxx is used when citing a botanical name authored by this person.' Paul venter (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. as spam ♠PMC(talk) 02:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTPROMO. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See below. Short answer: stupidity. Sorry about that, Frietjes! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. as spam ♠PMC(talk) 02:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't even a template, it's spam violating WP:NOTPROMO. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... because I didn't know any better, since this is the first time I've dealt with a template for deletion, and didn't connect the dots adequately in my brain? (facepalm) Sorry about that. Please let me know if I need to convert this to a CSD or do anything else. -- Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and defunct per Cheyenne Warriors Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not likely to be needed per Chicago Eagles (CIF) Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific variant of {{refimprove}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 12:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was used at the time of creation in 2000+ articles which were sourced to that site but otherwise often incorrect, duplicates, ... and which were eventually mass-deleted. The template was used to a) indicate the problem, and b) facilitate mass-tagging of the articles for deletion (instead of tagging all of them, I changed the template to include an AfD message on all articles where the template was added[1]. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geographic.org. Anyway, the template now no longer serve sa purpose, and we don't usually keep templates as "historical", I think, so if that's the case, it can be deleted. Fram (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, no clear use Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 12:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{wikia}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 12:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. see Category:Lists of mosques by city for the general contents Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Completely indiscriminate list of cities, not suitable for a template. Ajf773 (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is so weird. The template changed over time with cities added and deleted for no particular reason.Level C (talk) 22:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apparently I created this eleven years ago, but I have no recollection of it, nor any feeling about it. bd2412 T 10:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and overly specific Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused now that Featured Sounds is defunct Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, everything on it is redlinked Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains only two links Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, as I forget what it was planned to be used for. --Super Goku V (talk) 06:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly specific inclusion criteria, also unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all links redirect to the main article Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no clear criterion for "early" Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one article was ever created for it Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contains only one link. Total WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The primary purpose of navboxes is to link related topics to each other. So a navbox is not needed for just one station, and even if there were several it's still far from clear that "daytime-only" would be a substantive point of relation that warranted crosslinking them. Bearcat (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly specific and unused. We don't use "current" templates on other forms of television. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The point of these templates is that the article is changing rapidly because the story is so fast-developing that editors are literally swarming the article to get it updated, so that the article could be very different the moment you hit "refresh" after reading it once. Things like 9/11 and bridge collapses and public shootings. Television plots advancing normally, as television plots do, is nowhere near that realm of swarm-inducingness. Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, somewhat of a WP:PERFNAV anyway. Better suited to a category Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; Wikipedia:Co-op is defunct Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template went defunct in 2008. I see no reason to keep it "for historical reasons" as it only has five edits and no incoming links. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no proof that "big 4" refers to these Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True! The term "big 4" is unnecessary, and I have altered the template. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 21:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, entirely redlinked Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated and unused. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated and unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template for defunct wikiproject, no longer in use Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Wikipedia:Valued pictures was defunct long ago. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. There is no reason to put up a tag saying "Hey, I removed vandalism" anyway Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, complete OR in terms of grouping (luxury/mid-luxury/inexpensive), no clear inclusion criteria as only Dayton's was actually based in the Twin Cities. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains only one valid link. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2009 Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was going to be used for hatnotes, but the whole endeavor fell through due to lack of community consensus. Nuke it. The Transhumanist 01:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broken template, seems to be a test page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN, no parent article Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{wikia}} and unused. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).