Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scottish Islands

Scottish Islands Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Collaboration Archive

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Shapinsay for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another inhabited island although this time it is a case of mistaken identity. The census lists an island of that name, but the page was a redirect to Castle Tioram - which has not been inhabited for centuries and there are no other potentially habitable structures on the island. As Google Earth confirms the islet of the same name just offshore from Badachro has a couple of houses. Eilean Tioram now a stub rather than a redirect. Luckily there are not too many links to fix. Ben MacDui 19:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ben MacDui: Isn't it the same as Dry Island? Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right - thanks for this and now fixed. Eilean Tioram is now a redirect to Dry Island. (Looking at the links the latter was pretty much orphaned from other Scottish island articles prior to this switch.) Ben MacDui 17:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The census data for inhabited island should be produced in coming months. Including this information in an organised way will be a complex task.

1. Tables. I think the easiest way is to use the Islands by population density table, and add the new data there. This will create a single page for the relevant data. This could then replace the main table at Populated Islands with that data being archived in some easily accessible way at e.g. "Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands/Populated Islands early 21st Century Census Data" or similar.

The explanatory wording at "Islands by population density" and "Populated Islands" would then need to be carefully merged and the pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands/Navigation tweaked.

2. Main List articles. List of islands of Scotland and its subsidiary lists at Wikipedia:Featured topics/Islands of Scotland will then need updating.

3. Template:Infobox Scottish island will also need to be updated.

4. The nearly 100 individual articles and their infoboxes will then need to be updated. Unless someone knows of some clever automated system for infoboxes this will need to be done manually.

5. In order to make this task less onerous a new template for the census, similar to Template:NRS1C will be required. Ben MacDui 13:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ban MacDui, your post caused me to revisit the 'Islands by Population Density' table, and I happened to notice that Foula and Muck, adjacent in the list and with almost identical populations, were shown with the same population density, even though Foula is more than twice the area of Muck. So I corrected it (hope I got it right!) Dhmellor (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right and thanks. Ben MacDui 18:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shapinsay was nominated for a featured article review in November of last year. I had dealt with the bulk of the queries by March this year. After some additional input there has been no further comment for well over a month. However, so far only one editor has been kind enough to support FA status being retained. The discussion page is at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Shapinsay/archive1 and any input is welcome. Ben MacDui 08:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move to Slate Islands (Scotland). See Talk:Slate Islands. Ben MacDui 08:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]