• 31.167.3.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Level III. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• 182.2.52.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 491 five times in the last 5 minutes (Edits ending with emoticons or !, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• 2600:8805:2200:2270:68E1:4BA2:276:4A6B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing Breaktheicees (talk) 23:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

  No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Liberaldemocratofindia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Obvious COI issues, but not enough activity for a block. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Lonnyray (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Recidivist self-promotion account; continues to create self-promotional content despite repeated warnings. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• 118.179.197.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block invader. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 05:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 32 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 121 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 37 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• Stupidplanckunits (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• EndAnimalAbuse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "abuse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Username54433 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Bicharpoti (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "bich" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Bich can be a Vietnamese name or an Anglo-Saxon surname - make sure this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Public.contributor16 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 01:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Totallysigmaguyy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. [1]. FifthFive (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• FifthFive, please explain precisely how this username is a violation of WP:USERNAME? Cullen328 (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  I thought it might fall under 'intent to vandalize', but now I'm not so sure. FifthFive (talk) 05:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• IKEA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Dishwasher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B0F1:827:8FD3:78B5 (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Probably because it isn't edited much to begin with. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Israel Policy Forum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruptive editing by COI editors. C F A 💬 01:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Wests Tigers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Mao Zedong Still a better peson than bryan adams (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuzz. Indef, and account globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, LTA Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 18:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, the irony Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Slap me with the fish. I dare you.)} 18:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 00:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• PFC_Levski_Sofia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: @176.222.3.98: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• {{https://bg.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%A4%D0%9A_%E2%80%9E%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%E2%80%9C_(%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F) }}

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: This request would need to be made at the equivalent board on bg.wikipedia, not here. —C.Fred (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't think there is a equivalent board. 176.222.3.98 (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

That doesn't mean we can do anything about it here. Ask a steward. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: @176.222.3.98: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Alaska (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

INDEFINITE semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. IP vandalized Oregon and Washington articles 3 weeks earlier and then an administrator semi-protected Oregon indefinitely and Washington for one year. The IP vandalized this article FIVE times today. There have been at least 8 previous protections and nothing seems to be working. Time for indef semi 2603:8080:D03:89D4:877:EA69:42DE:1241 (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 116.12.3.104 (talk · contribs) blocked by Kusma. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Alvin and the Chipmunks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Sporadic vandalism by IPs and registered/unregistered editors alike. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That's another way of saying "sporadic". Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Hurricane Helene (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hurricane caused significant damage please protect. BryceM2001 (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Comment Protection may be inappropriate for merely disruptive editing. Pages are not protected pre-emptively and the amount of vandalism has been manageable. However, I do believe it could become a target for sockpuppets in the near future, but that's irrelevant here. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Karl-Anthony Towns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – SPORTSTRANS. Will120 (talk) 02:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• FIFA Club World Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Comedy Central (Latin American TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Erika Ishii (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 05:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

• Thomas Matthew Crooks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Its been 2 months and the edits are slowing down, 2 edit requests, plus most of the drama is on the assassination attempt not crooks himself 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@2D Is Better Than 3D: This page was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 03:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Not unprotected: the protection cannot be undone through this process, per above. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

• Benmite (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Greeneyed soul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Meets minimum criteria, only one article out of many created has been deleted (in 2015). Mach61 23:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Guessitsnotavis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Sock of User:Guessitsavis, used for editing in regions with sub-par internet privacy. Guessitsnotavis (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

This is my sock. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 22:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done stwalkerster (talk) 10:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

• Sneezless (Public) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

This is an alt of User:Sneezless, used for editing on unsecure public computers. Sneezless (Public) (talk page) (contribs) 17:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Confirming that is my sock, though you might already have seen that on the extended confirmed page. Sneezless (talk page) (contribs) 17:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done – You are now confirmed. for three moths, which presumably is more than enought time to become autoconfirmed. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today}

• Trailblazer101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting file mover rights because I have experience in handling and maintaining various file types and I believe my contributions to several files and my various file rename requests as seen in the editing history here showcase my understanding of the naming policy for files. File names are often a decent part of my contributions with film and television-related articles, and carrying out these renames to satisfy naming conventions rather than having to request them every time a file needs to be renamed would prove beneficial in their up-keeping. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

• GhostInTheMachine (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

@GhostInTheMachine: with regards to your first intended use case: you do understand that you're only allowed to suppress the redirect when it would otherwise qualify for a CSD (in this case, probably WP:R3), right? Just being a somewhat bad title isn't enough to suppress. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Understood. This would be limited to really clear typos. Keeping the redirect has value in many/most other cases. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 16:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 16:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

• Jlwoodwa (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I frequently make/request moves – usually either making titles WP:CONCISE, or draftifying/fixing typos in titles as part of WP:NPP. I would like to be able to handle more of these myself, including WP:R2 suppression, but especially WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA pageswaps. These usually require updating the categories afterward, which will be much easier if I'm doing the pageswap myself, rather than remembering to come back once my request at WP:RM/T is carried out. Speaking of which, I've really appreciated WP:RM/T, and if I'm granted the pagemover right I intend to "give back" by handling requests there. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 15:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

• Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

• Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Cactinites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello i'm TyphoonAmpil. i Revert Vandalism single August last month. I'm Patrolling Recent Changes, Very High track record over 150 reverts. i use Anti-Vandal. too slow WP:UV and WP:TW too fast WP:AntiVandal. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 01:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 01:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I asked you to spend a month gaining experience. It's been ~2 weeks since I declined your previous request. Sorry, but that's just not enough experience for me to determine whether you'll be able to use the tool appropriately. -Fastily 05:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily sorry. can spend a month on October 10, 2024? †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 07:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

• QEnigma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am active on English Wikipedia, primarily editing articles related to Sri Lanka. During the recent presidential election, I encountered multiple instances of vandalism and disruptive editing on related pages, necessitating the reversion of several edits along with sucessful requests for page protection. However, resolving these issues proved challenging due to edit conflicts, which prevented a simple undo and required manual corrections that were both tedious and time-consuming. Given the contentious nature of the period and the number of significant upcoming events, I would appreciate being granted rollback rights to better combat vandalism and disruptive editing. QEnigma (talk) 08:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 05:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

• Owais Al Qarni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I rely on mobile scripts for this purpose, but they occasionally fail to function properly. Obtaining rollback rights would enable me to manage these issues more efficiently. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 05:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

• P199 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 8 years)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1 (other sandboxes were edited before protection enabled)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)

Primefac (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Primefac: My "need for the right, as well as a familiarity with the care and responsibility required" is proven by my overall record and experience with WP, not necessarily meeting an arbitrary guideline limit. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I made no claims about your need, or lack thereof. I was simply filling out the standard guideline review. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)