Property talk:P8329

Type “research project (Q1298668), space instrument (Q100349043), space mission (Q2133344), spacecraft (Q40218), research group (Q1241025), witchcraft investigation (Q66458810), grant (Q230788)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “research project (Q1298668), space instrument (Q100349043), space mission (Q2133344), spacecraft (Q40218), research group (Q1241025), witchcraft investigation (Q66458810), grant (Q230788)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#Type Q1298668, Q100349043, Q2133344, Q40218, Q1241025, Q66458810, Q230788, SPARQL

Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#citation needed, hourly updated report

Value type “human (Q5)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#Value type Q5, SPARQL

I recently created an entity for a similar role — co-principal investigator (Q106648356). My thinking is that the roles are similar enough (as opposed to a deputy principal investigator (Q105834068)) and that multiple Co-PIs can be added as principal investigator (P8329). Is that the best way to do it, or should they be added as a participant (P710) with the qualifier stating that they are a Co-PI as I did on this entity? Thanks! Aluxosm (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following this request for comments, the French label now includes the male and the female form. PAC2 (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should this also be used for the officer in charge of major police investigations (criminal or non-criminal)? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]