Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/03

The logo does not consist of simple geometrical figures. Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Plain text and a simple arc with a small "wing". If this is not a simple geometrical figure, what is? --P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simple geometrical figures are, for example, rings, ovals, ellipses, rectangles, parabolas, hyperbolas and even some spirals. I cannot name figures on the logo, they are not simple. And this is not simple arc. Simple arc has constant curvature, in the logo curvature changes, its thickness changes as well. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No information on COM:Ukraine about ToO. @NickK: @Ahonc: for their thoughts. Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: There seems to be no clear definition of ToO in Ukrainian copyright law, for example, according to this article the main criterion used is judicial examination. The 2023 copyright changes relaxed the definition of ToO, and a work now must meet all four conditions to be above ToO: it must be (a) creative, (b) own, (c) intellectual work involving (d) specific creative decisions. Thus the focus seems to be on the ability of the author to explain their creative process, and in case of this logo it does seem to be creative.

Note that at the time of creation this logo was {{PD-UA-exempt}} as logos of organisations could not have been copyrighted. The airport was since privatised (its current owner is Нью Системс АМ) and the copyright exemption for organisation logos was removed amid the 2023 copyright reform, but at the time of creation it was in public domain in Ukraine — NickK (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like TOO + PD-text for me.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The depicted exhibition-billboard is above COM:TOO. Unfortunately, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

• File:Wikipedia-facade-ndp.jpg
• File:Façade du Musée de La Poste.jpg
• File:Façade du Musée de la Poste avec la dernière exposition À la pointe de l’Art à l'affiche.jpg
• File:Facade-musee-la-poste-wk2.jpg
• File:Façade du musée avec l'exposition Transmission(s) à l'affiche.jpg

 Keep Although the series was obviously photographed to chronicle the different displays, the size of the posters are less that a quarter of the phoots, should b e de mininis. --Qualitätssicherung (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The billboards are an essential part of the photographs, and so they are not de minimis in my opinion. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what is this supposed to show? it only shows a few blobs so it seems like the wrong file was selected or there was an error Prototyperspective (talk) 13:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the file is broken – I reported this at wearebeautiful/wearebeautiful-models#1 a while ago, but a fixed version unfortunately never materialized, and given the project’s termination in the meantime (it’s now “frozen”), it seems uncertain if it ever will. (If I understand correctly, the solid should be generated from the corresponding surface, which is intact; but even if we can figure out how to do the conversion, I’m not sure if it would be right from us to deviate from the upstream source that way, to be honest.)

I’d rather not delete the file, as we otherwise have all the We Are Beautiful (now known as Hidden Beauty) files on Commons (AFAIK), and I think it’s valuable to have the whole set mirrored; but we could certainly update the description and categorization, if you think that makes sense. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self-drawn flag with false description. w:Kievan Rus didnt have flag, see w:Talk:Kievan Rus' for discussion about this attrempt Altenmann (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake. It is not a flag, but rather a banner. Though, as a banner, it was real and used by Kievan Rus, as per real chronicles. I can list my sources if you so desire. Vbokivs (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot list sources, because you have none, as we may see from w:Talk:Kievan Rus'. It is your interpretation of chronicles that it was a flag or banner of Kievan Rus. You need scholarly sources that say so. Altenmann (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree with the conclusions at the talk page above, not the flag or official banner of Kievan Rus' Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imagen borrosa Yhhue91 (talk) 19:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyrighted unicorn character with mask. Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imagen borrosa y reiterada Yhhue91 (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong oppose I can see the image correctly, all the images I have uploaded are different. --Ovruni (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imagen borrosa y reiterada Yhhue91 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong oppose I can see the image correctly, all the images I have uploaded are different. --Ovruni (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imagen borrosa y reiterada Yhhue91 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong oppose I can see the image correctly, all the images I have uploaded are different. --Ovruni (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imagen borrosa y reiterada Yhhue91 (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong oppose I can see the image correctly, all the images I have uploaded are different. --Ovruni (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is tagged with Template:PD-US, but there's no evidence that it applies. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep below COM:TOO USA. I've updated the license tag to {{PD-Textlogo}}. Consigned (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]