User talk:discospinster
![]() |
If I have deleted your article and you would like to know why, please first have a look at the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines:
![]() |
---|
4 September 2024 |
|
Hantz Jerly Delva
[edit]Please unblock this user so that we can create an independent profile for him so that we can find him a club a lot more faster. 217.61.170.202 (talk) 07:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, that is not what Wikipedia is for. ... discospinster talk 15:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Last edit
[edit]There was a link you needed to click on the little one and you get the article then click the arrow to the second photo Lemonmannn (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is no Wikipedia article about this individual. ... discospinster talk 17:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
TPA revoking
[edit]Wedontcare183 (talk · contribs) may need their talk page editing privileges revoked. ObserveOwl (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. ... discospinster talk 17:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Unexplained Content removal at that school article
[edit]The one you just reverted was actually a good edit, everything that was deleted was total gibberish. I'm gonna remake it, and I'll add a reason for it. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Some of it was hard to read, but it was not gibberish, and there was a lot of sourced content also removed in the edit. ... discospinster talk 17:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Would you have a moment to look at Swan Lake, New York? Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, what's the particular concern with it? ... discospinster talk 23:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed you had reverted an editor there. I've tried to clean up the article, but the same editor is now using their IP to edit. When I remove their mess, they revert and add more crap about a murder that happened there. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Sergeant Reckless Undo Edit
[edit]I'm sure there is probably a reason that the wording children is better than foal, but foal is a horse's child so i don't see why children would be better.
(Edit link: prev) (first time sending a topic post in a talk page so sorry if a messed anything up)
Thanks, Simcardholder Simcardholder (talk) 15:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Misc. for deletion discussion needs closing.
[edit]User:Muster3633/sandbox Discussion needs to be closed, it seems the person who opened the discussion opened it to pressure the user into submitting it to AFC. It was submitted to AFC and moved to draftspace, the discussion just needs someone to close it. Shadow311 (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion was closed.Shadow311 (talk) 01:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted text
[edit]Why delete my edit. The information I added was 100% genuine. 2A02:C7E:6087:9A00:2674:ABF3:4244:EED9 (talk) 23:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- There was no reliable source to back it up. ... discospinster talk 23:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
removal of link
[edit]Hello,
The link was provided as another example of a career assessment. The article already included other examples but the Career Fit Test is unique as it asesses interests, skills and personality traits. Please let me know if you have other questions.
Thank you, Kevin Cccwikied879 (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- The other ones were included because they were mentioned in another source. ... discospinster talk 23:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you!!
[edit]Hello sir, I really appreciate you reverting the vandalism on the Briahna Joy Gray Page. I was wondering if you banned the person responsible I tried to but don't know how. I saw countless other instances of vandalism on their user page. Minnesotawaterballer (talk) 00:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/content-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 16:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
"Strangers On A Train" - Alfred Hitchcock film released in 1951.
[edit]Hello. I don't understand why you have reversed my edits to this entry today. Clearly the actual roles played by Robert Walker as Guy and Farley Granger as Bruno have been confused and have been swapped. Thank you. Peter Rodaway 82.19.125.77 (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Farley Granger played Guy and Robert Walker was Bruno. ... discospinster talk 18:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, yes you are correct. I just watched the film earlier and misunderstood which actor was which. Apologies.
Obesity
[edit]The other page references the World Population Review, a BS source. Im using the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Stop 98.150.89.19 (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are making very significant changes to the page, and removing other reliable sources. This needs to be discussed on the talk page first. ... discospinster talk 14:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Got a minute spare for a likely LTA’s nonsense?
[edit]Hey Disco. What do you make of this page history? Original creator’s GLocked, probably LTA, and we’ve got an IP reverting the speedy notice.
Thanks. MM (Give me info.) (Victories) 15:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Clearly an IP block evasion; I have blocked them as well. Thanks for letting me know. ... discospinster talk 15:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Just a heads-up, it takes two to edit-war, and even if the hatnote is an improvement, it's best to not keep reverting the IP again and again, as you're technically at your fourth revert already. I'd suggest to wait to see if they reply to us on their talk page, and/or open a section on the article's talk page itself. Good luck! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- WP:EDITWAR does not apply to reverting vandalism. ... discospinster talk 23:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- True, but it doesn't technically counts as vandalism, as they're not removing stuff for purely disruptive purposes but arguing that the hatnote is unnecessary (to quote their edit summary,
The game has nothing to do with the subject
). For that matter, I don't agree with them and think the hatnote is good, but it is a reasonable position to have, and doesn't fit the exemption ofReverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
(emphasis not mine) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)- It is obvious vandalism, ... discospinster talk 23:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vandalism for edit-warring purposes is pretty strictly defined, and, if a well-intentioned user like myself can disagree with this characterization, I don't think that it is clear-cut enough for an edit warring exemption. Yes, it is unhelpful to remove the hatnote, but I can (kind of) understand their case and see that they're not doing it to explicitly disrupt the encyclopedia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- You do your thing your way and I'll do my thing my way. ... discospinster talk 23:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vandalism for edit-warring purposes is pretty strictly defined, and, if a well-intentioned user like myself can disagree with this characterization, I don't think that it is clear-cut enough for an edit warring exemption. Yes, it is unhelpful to remove the hatnote, but I can (kind of) understand their case and see that they're not doing it to explicitly disrupt the encyclopedia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is obvious vandalism, ... discospinster talk 23:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- True, but it doesn't technically counts as vandalism, as they're not removing stuff for purely disruptive purposes but arguing that the hatnote is unnecessary (to quote their edit summary,
ANI
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cinderella157 (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)