User talk:Ahonc/Archives/June 2017
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
File:Емблема ФК «Скала».jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Дугин А. Г.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:25 карбованців 1989 Б.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vahe (talk) 16:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:25 карбованців 1988 р.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vahe (talk) 16:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ahonc. Could you please tell me which policy bans categories with only one image? I need this category to add it as an interwiki to a Wikidata item, and obviously I cannot add an interwiki to a single image. I can consider creating a gallery of just one item, but I thought it would be way more useless than a category with just one item which still makes sense for me from structural point of view. Thanks — NickK (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- According the policy a category is a software feature of MediaWiki, a special page which is intended to group related pages and media. In practice, it implies that you'll associate a single subject with a given category. So it should group some pages or files. One page/file cannot create group and so does not create separate category.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- The category had one media file, i.e. it had media. What is the criterion that was used for deletion of this category? — NickK (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- I do not see reasons for creation new category here. If tehre are no reasons for creation, it should not be created.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- I cited you at least one very good reason for creation: adding it as a Wikidata link to the Polish Wikipedia article. In any case, I don't ask you to create it yourself, I have had done it. I don't want to know why you don't want to create it, I want to know why you deleted it — NickK (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- should not be created ⇒ should not exist; should not exist ⇒ should be deleted. Category is not reason. Many football players, railway stations, WLM objects etc have no category, because have obly one picture. Why here we should have it?--Anatoliy (talk) 09:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Once again, which rules say that? COM:CAT says that categories are for media, one media file is media. COM:D states that non-empty categories should usually go through COM:CFD. Moreover, your examples are just wrong: Category:Players of Ukraine national association football team has 24 categories of just 1 file, Category:Train stations in Kiev Oblast has 2, and Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Ukraine with known IDs has over 50. Please don't tell me all these people were wrong and you will delete them all — NickK (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- For Kiev Oblast's train stations I've just fixed it. Maybe that categories have more photos but then they were deleted. About other - I do not care about them. About rules - I've already stated what police says: category should have group of media or pages. One page/medium does not form group.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Hedwig in Washington: As another administrator involved in this, could you please confirm what Commons policies state about categories containing exactly one media file? Looks like we (me and Ahonc) read the same policies but don't understand them the same way. Thanks — NickK (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- For Kiev Oblast's train stations I've just fixed it. Maybe that categories have more photos but then they were deleted. About other - I do not care about them. About rules - I've already stated what police says: category should have group of media or pages. One page/medium does not form group.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Once again, which rules say that? COM:CAT says that categories are for media, one media file is media. COM:D states that non-empty categories should usually go through COM:CFD. Moreover, your examples are just wrong: Category:Players of Ukraine national association football team has 24 categories of just 1 file, Category:Train stations in Kiev Oblast has 2, and Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Ukraine with known IDs has over 50. Please don't tell me all these people were wrong and you will delete them all — NickK (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- should not be created ⇒ should not exist; should not exist ⇒ should be deleted. Category is not reason. Many football players, railway stations, WLM objects etc have no category, because have obly one picture. Why here we should have it?--Anatoliy (talk) 09:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- I cited you at least one very good reason for creation: adding it as a Wikidata link to the Polish Wikipedia article. In any case, I don't ask you to create it yourself, I have had done it. I don't want to know why you don't want to create it, I want to know why you deleted it — NickK (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- I do not see reasons for creation new category here. If tehre are no reasons for creation, it should not be created.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- The category had one media file, i.e. it had media. What is the criterion that was used for deletion of this category? — NickK (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi again. I have asked at Commons:Help desk#Categories with only one file and two experienced users confirmed that categories with only one file are acceptable. Would you please undelete this category so that I can use it? Thanks — NickK (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Євгеній Зеленський.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Видалені файли
Привіт, тут мої файли разом із супровідним текстом видалили. Можеш мені переслати все? trydence@gmail.com--Trydence (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Як матиму час, перешлю.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Чорновіл, Крайній праворуч угорі - Шутов І.Я..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |