User talk:Marcomogollon
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:23, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dnielectronicoperu.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dnielectronicoperu.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 19:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Dear High Contrast,
I changed the picture and the license for a lower resolution that I took personally.
Just in case, I work in RENIEC / Falls, ich arbeite bei RENIEC
--Marcomogollon (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Please, delete the previous photos and your warning... / Bitte, löschen sie die fotos oben und ihre warnung... --Marcomogollon (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Peruvian_Army has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
ErickAgain 14:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Amigo, por favor bórrala, la había creado por error. Sorry... MarcoMogollon (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:P Palacio.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ezarateesteban 20:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:100intis.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:100intis.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:100intis.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 08:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Gunnex. La unidad monetaria denominada Inti dejó de ser de "curso legal" desde 1991 y su ley de creación (Ley Nº 24064 [1]) fue derogada mediante la la Ley Nº 25295, que estableció la nueva unidad monetaria del Nuevo Sol.[2] Además, la Ley Nº 24064 en ningún artículo dispone que las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Intis tengan copyright. Lo mismo se aplica para las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Soles de Oro (1863-1985) anteriores a los Intis. ¿Me puedes explicar de qué manera monedas sin valor legal y cuyas leyes fueron derogadas pueden llegar a tener algún copyright?[3]
- Es absolutamente falso que los billetes peruanos tengan copyright, pues no existe ninguna ley que lo especifique. En "Terms of Use" acerca de la información del BCRP dice "is offered to the general public for informational purposes only", y en la versión en español [4] dice: "El contenido del Portal de Internet del BCRP se elabora con fines informativos y su uso es responsabilidad del visitante. Puede reproducirse total o parcialmente, sin autorización expresa, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.", ¿y qué hay en ese portal? pues imágenes de los billetes y monedas peruanos, los mismos que tú "dices" que tienen copyright basándote únicamente en la legislación de otros países.
- Un saludo y espero que retires tu plantilla de borrado. MarcoMogollon (talk) 03:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Please, revisa el Decreto Legislativo 822 de 1996, Ley sobre el derecho de autor, que no menciona ni a las monedas ni a los billetes como objetos de "derechos de autor" o protección por parte del Estado. Bye, MarcoMogollon (talk) 04:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2011.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2012.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2013.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2014.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2015.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol RNP Anchoveta.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol RNP Cacao.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol RNP Quinua.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Arquitectura moqueguana.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Caral.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Catedral de Lima.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP chullpas.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP estela raimondi.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Hotel Palace.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Huaca de la Luna.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Huarautambo.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP huaytara.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP karajia.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP kotosh.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP kunturwasi.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP mpicchu.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP pajaten.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP paracas.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP Petroglifos de Pusharo.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP realfelipe.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP saywite.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP scatalina.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP tumi.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP tunanmarca.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP vicus.png
- File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP vilcashuaman.png
- File:Sol P icon blue.png
Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 14:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sipan P icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dnielectronicoperu.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dnielectronicoperu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dnielectronicoperu.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/content-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 180.png was recently deleted
[edit]File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 180.png was recently deleted by Túrelio, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : File not required. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 170.png was recently deleted
[edit]File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 170.png was recently deleted by Túrelio, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : File not required. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 160.png was recently deleted
[edit]File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 160.png was recently deleted by Túrelio, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : File not required. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 190.png was recently deleted
[edit]File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 190.png was recently deleted by Túrelio, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : File not required. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sport of Athletics barnstar 10.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sport records icon AR.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
185.209.238.238 10:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ok no problem, if the image will be replaced by a substitute in SVG. Marco M. (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cono este de Lima - mapa.png
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cono este de Lima - mapa.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Fæ (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Areasoflima.png
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Areasoflima.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Fæ (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:University of North Dakota logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/content-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg/220px-Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg)
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)