Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

"stone seats to them are dedicated" -- wouldn't "are dedicated to them" read better?:Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @TFA coordinators: for input... This seems like it's probably a sensible change, "stone seats to them" doesn't scan well on its own.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024 Lebanon pager explosions: orange-tagged for neutrality. No idea on the merits of it. Therapyisgood (talk) 13:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Re pager explosions, there appears to have been a second wave, this time with handheld radios exploding in a similar manner.^[1] Blurb should be updated. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Updated the toll and changed to 'electronic devices'. Stephen 00:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The article is still tagged {{NPOV}}. Either it should be pulled or the spurious tag should be removed. We don't link to articles from the home page when there are major defects. Jehochman ^Talk 03:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @El C pinging the posting admin. BorgQueen (talk) 05:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just realized this. Jehochman, is right.

Also a merge tag, which kept the death of fujimori article off the main page.Sportsnut24 (talk) 06:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert on the page's subject. However, looking at the talk page's discussion, it's not clear whether the article is littered with NPOV issues, or if a few inline tags (e.g. {{POV statement}}, {{Unbalanced opinion}}, etc.) might more clearly identify the concerns, or if there are still even issues? —Bagumba (talk) 08:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another one from Queue 2: ... that the course of the River Tay was diverted to allow the construction of the Jubilee Bridge?

The source, however, says that North of [the bridge], the course of the River Tay was diverted to allow the new road to run along the river valley. This doesn't seem to support the hook? I'm not a road person so perhaps this is fine. Pinging people involved: BorgQueen, JuniperChill, Voorts. Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read it as the road connecting to the bridge, so it was necessary to divert the river to build that road so that the bridge could be built. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another source says "In mid-July 1975 a short length of the River Tay north of Dunkeld was diverted from its normal course into a new man-made channel. This work was necessary for the construction of the embankment for the new road." So again giving the reason for the diversion as the road not the bridge. Vladimir.copic (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vladimir.copic @Voorts I've switched it to the other hook from the nomination, with a slight rewording. BorgQueen (talk) 06:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• * ... that a viral dance in which performers mimic driving a car was performed by Amish content creators, who substituted operating a horse and buggy? I highly doubt these were actually "Amish content creators". the Amish do not like being photographed and reject technology as a whole. see here. Additionally the article says "In addition, a version of the dance was produced by #Amishtiktok content creators". "#Amishtiktok content creators" may or may not be Amish. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A quick internet search suggests, unsurprisingly, that the dancers were not Amish. TSventon (talk) 02:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... someone lied on the Internet? No, can't be. Therapyisgood (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded. BorgQueen (talk) 05:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer ping. BorgQueen (talk) 05:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me.--Launchballer 08:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.