User contributions for Colourinthemeaning

25 February 2010

• 08:0308:03, 25 February 2010 diff hist −145‎ Ramot, East Jerusalem ‎ Removed international community due to opposition. But no source for current US position so it has been removed unless someone wants to move it down to the US's previous positions?
• 07:5807:58, 25 February 2010 diff hist −6‎ m Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎No edit summary
• 07:5707:57, 25 February 2010 diff hist +340‎ Ramot, East Jerusalem ‎ Given Breein feels they are somehow exempt from having to enter discussion, I have reverted. Source is provided for majority orthodox, see economist article, as source is provided for disputed.
• 07:5007:50, 25 February 2010 diff hist +2‎ m User talk:Gilabrand ‎No edit summary
• 07:4907:49, 25 February 2010 diff hist +830‎ User talk:Gilabrand ‎ →‎Attn: Request for Immediate response & stop removal of sources: new section
• 07:4407:44, 25 February 2010 diff hist +650‎ Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎ →‎Sources: new section
• 07:3907:39, 25 February 2010 diff hist +617‎ East Talpiot ‎ Added sources Gilabrand has vandalised and removed, but added to his own additions so as to keep them. This kind of vandalism though Gilabrand is not acceptable.
• 07:3107:31, 25 February 2010 diff hist +344‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎ →‎Municipal Services: new section
• 07:2707:27, 25 February 2010 diff hist −178‎ Neve Yaakov ‎ Updated to include sources added by Gilabrand and others, but still waiting for source on its location being in Jerusalem, aside from a Pro-Israeli one, if international/Pro-Pales ones wont be allowed
• 07:2407:24, 25 February 2010 diff hist +185‎ Neve Yaakov ‎ Source for it being a neighborhood calls it a disputed neighborhood. You have provided no sources for it being a part of Jerusalem.

24 February 2010

• 09:3709:37, 24 February 2010 diff hist +583‎ Wikipedia:Third opinion ‎ →‎Active disagreements
• 09:3209:32, 24 February 2010 diff hist +548‎ Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎No edit summary
• 08:3708:37, 24 February 2010 diff hist +321‎ Jerusalem ‎ Updated to take NPOV position in lead and with academic sources.. Lead should not take one POV so unequivocally.
• 07:5707:57, 24 February 2010 diff hist +523‎ Neve Yaakov ‎ Updated to reflect sources, added new ones and make clear the difference between N.Y. the pre-1967 development, and post-1967 one.
• 07:3407:34, 24 February 2010 diff hist +14‎ m Talk:Ramot, East Jerusalem ‎No edit summary
• 07:3307:33, 24 February 2010 diff hist +765‎ Talk:Ramot, East Jerusalem ‎ →‎Located IN Jerusalem? Why not disputed?: new section
• 07:2407:24, 24 February 2010 diff hist +96‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎ →‎Ring Neighborhood: new section
• 07:0407:04, 24 February 2010 diff hist +2,914‎ User talk:Colourinthemeaning ‎No edit summary
• 07:0107:01, 24 February 2010 diff hist −1‎ User talk:Breein1007 ‎No edit summary
• 06:5106:51, 24 February 2010 diff hist −1‎ m User talk:Breein1007 ‎ typo
• 06:5106:51, 24 February 2010 diff hist +17‎ User talk:Breein1007 ‎No edit summary
• 06:5006:50, 24 February 2010 diff hist +701‎ User talk:Breein1007 ‎ →‎Response: new section
• 06:2806:28, 24 February 2010 diff hist +116‎ m User talk:Breein1007 ‎ added ~~~~
• 06:2706:27, 24 February 2010 diff hist +245‎ User talk:Breein1007 ‎ →‎Deletion of 'Please stop': new section
• 05:4905:49, 24 February 2010 diff hist +789‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎No edit summary
• 05:2105:21, 24 February 2010 diff hist +360‎ Talk:Gilo ‎No edit summary
• 05:1205:12, 24 February 2010 diff hist +265‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎No edit summary
• 05:1105:11, 24 February 2010 diff hist +1,315‎ Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎No edit summary
• 04:5604:56, 24 February 2010 diff hist +464‎ Talk:East Talpiot ‎No edit summary
• 04:5004:50, 24 February 2010 diff hist +1,491‎ Talk:Gilo ‎No edit summary
• 04:3204:32, 24 February 2010 diff hist +717‎ Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎No edit summary
• 04:2604:26, 24 February 2010 diff hist +860‎ Talk:East Talpiot ‎No edit summary
• 04:1804:18, 24 February 2010 diff hist +206‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎No edit summary
• 04:1504:15, 24 February 2010 diff hist +441‎ Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance ‎ →‎User:Breein1007: new section
• 04:1204:12, 24 February 2010 diff hist +1,339‎ User talk:Breein1007 ‎ →‎Please Stop: new section

23 February 2010

• 11:2911:29, 23 February 2010 diff hist +329‎ User talk:Gilabrand ‎ →‎Please take part in dialogue: new section
• 11:2411:24, 23 February 2010 diff hist +557‎ Talk:Pisgat Ze'ev ‎ →‎'Dumbness'/ IN Jerusalem or not.: new section
• 11:2011:20, 23 February 2010 diff hist +956‎ Pisgat Ze'ev ‎ You have provided no source for 'under arab pressure' and is simply POV. You have made absolutely disgraceful, racist edits.. these have no place on wikipedia. There were plenty of pressures involved.
• 11:1911:19, 23 February 2010 diff hist +20‎ Pisgat Ze'ev ‎ Undid revision 345853605 by Gilabrand (talk) Dumbness? I am not the one unwilling to read the sources.
• 11:1311:13, 23 February 2010 diff hist +636‎ Talk:East Talpiot ‎No edit summary
• 11:0811:08, 23 February 2010 diff hist +1,286‎ Talk:East Talpiot ‎No edit summary
• 11:0211:02, 23 February 2010 diff hist +535‎ Talk:Gilo ‎ →‎'Disputed residential development' Vs 'disputed neighborhood': new section
• 10:5910:59, 23 February 2010 diff hist +516‎ Ramot, East Jerusalem ‎ And you felt the need to remove 'disputed' from the lead, why? Source added for EU position.
• 10:5710:57, 23 February 2010 diff hist +513‎ East Talpiot ‎ Nothing about this edit was POV, except that it stated ALL the relevant ones. Gilabrand you cannot simply remove sources and delete facts you do not like.
• 10:5510:55, 23 February 2010 diff hist +1,067‎ Talk:Gilo ‎ →‎New Tactics: new section
• 10:4410:44, 23 February 2010 diff hist +102‎ m Neve Yaakov ‎ Another source added.
• 10:4310:43, 23 February 2010 diff hist +639‎ Talk:Neve Yaakov ‎ →‎International Community: new section
• 10:4110:41, 23 February 2010 diff hist +246‎ Neve Yaakov ‎ Sure some sources call it a neighborhood, many also call it a settlement, others again 'disputed neighborhood' and some 'disputed settlement' or 'settlement neighborhood'. Sources added..
• 10:0010:00, 23 February 2010 diff hist +275‎ Pisgat Ze'ev ‎ Its location 'within' Jerusalem is itself disputed, sources added..

21 February 2010

• 09:4109:41, 21 February 2010 diff hist +130‎ Neve Yaakov ‎ Updated to take NPOV stance actually reflect what sources say.