Jump to content

User contributions for Mike Schwartz

A user with 3,614 edits. Account created on 2 September 2004.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 September 2024

  • 05:5805:58, 13 September 2024 diff hist +123 Basel III→‎US version of the Basel Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirements: Change the value of the "title" field in the "ref" tag for footnote no. "[15]" from "Archived copy" <--("see also" the question in parentheses, in the previous edit to this article, by which footnote no. "[8]" was updated.) to the phrase "Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards, and Monitoring". Also add a "publisher" field, with a publisher field value of "The Federal Reserve System". current
  • 05:3705:37, 13 September 2024 diff hist +686 Basel III→‎CET1 capital requirements: Change the value of the "title" field in the "ref" tag for footnote no. "[8]" from "Archived copy" <--(was that "title" phrase 'set' or 'chosen' by some robot? and/OR chosen to "go with" the "archive-url" field value, but NOT with the [now dead/'former'] "url" field value?) to the phrase (translated from ['Brazilian'] Portuguese to English courtesy of "Google Translate") "Understanding Basel III". Also, add a (translated) "QUOTE" field, for readers of English.

12 September 2024

8 September 2024

  • 20:2120:21, 8 September 2024 diff hist +920 Talk:Bose–Einstein statistics→‎What about Superconductivity -- ? --: new section current Tag: New topic
  • 20:0320:03, 8 September 2024 diff hist +1 Clostridium→‎top: CHANGE the singular noun "tract" (part of the phrase "intestinal tract") to use the plural word "tracts" instead. Technically (grammatically) speaking, perhaps the rules of grammar do not (absolutely) prohibit using a singular noun here, even though it is being modified by the prepositional phrase "of animals", where the word "animals" is clearly plural. HOWEVER, in this case, one can clearly see that the direct object of the verb "inhabit" includes both 'soils' (plural) and this word. current
  • 17:5517:55, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 m Section 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution→‎top: MINOR grammatical (and choice of words) correction: The singular verb "is" appears to disagree (in "number") with the plural (or... IS it really plural?) noun "terms". However, in this case, rather than changing the verb -- "is" -- to [the plural verb] "are", the best remedy is probably to use the (singular) noun "subclause"; partly because the noun phrase "the 'just terms' provision" -- (at the end of the sentence) -- is singular, even though it does include the (plural) word "terms". current
  • 16:2916:29, 8 September 2024 diff hist +1 m J. D. Tippit→‎top: MINOR grammatical correction: The word "has" (a part of the verb [whose infinitive is] "to have") is required -- as is the word "remain" -- to "agree in number" ("agreement in number" usually involves being either singular or plural) with the subject [the noun phrase "The commission's findings", which includes the plural noun "findings"]. The verb "remain" is plural, so it already agrees "in number" with the [plural] noun phrase "The commission's findings". But "has" is [was] singular. current

6 September 2024

4 September 2024

  • 12:1112:11, 4 September 2024 diff hist +2 Mycotoxin→‎Production: Replace the obsolete word "diminute" with the word "diminutive". https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/diminute says that "diminute" -- used as an adjective -- was already "[Not in use.]" way back in 1828! Also, https://wikidiff.com/diminute/diminutive says that the adjective "diminute" is obsolete, and www.dictionary.com says "No results found for Diminute". Even wikt:diminute says that, [as an adjective], it is: "(obsolete)"; though it may still be used as a verb.

1 September 2024

  • 10:4210:42, 1 September 2024 diff hist +928 Five Minutes of Heaven→‎Release: Fix a the ["{{dead link}}"] value of the URL in footnote number "[9]". That URL gave a "404", and the solution (to fix it) was not a different URL. Instead, an "archive-url", was used, ... which involved changing to use a "{{cite web}}". A first TRY of the URL https://web.archive.org/web/20121025223525/https://variety.com/article/VR1117999028.html?categoryId=1061&cs=1 gave (for a few seconds) a web page saying "Got an HTTP 301 response at crawl time"; but then it found its way.

30 August 2024

29 August 2024

28 August 2024

  • 23:0923:09, 28 August 2024 diff hist +105 Ice sheet→‎Marine ice cliff instability: Update (correct) the answer to a "time interval" calculation -- (the number of years from 12,300 years B.P. to 11,200 B.P.) -- in the last sentence of the second paragraph of this section. The numbers (-12,300 and -11,200) were quoted correctly from the reliable source (the journal Nature, from Oct. of 2017) of footnote no. [43], but whoever tried to subtract those two numbers (to get the difference), made a mistake. The answer is 1100 years; not 900 years. current
  • 05:3405:34, 28 August 2024 diff hist −1 HTTP→‎top: Change [the instance or "use" of] the word "obsolesce", to "obsolete" instead. Rationale: the word is used here as a transitive verb (a verb having a 'direct object'.) For some evidence that "obsolesce" is an intransitive verb, see [A.2] https://www.websters1913.com/words/Obsolesce ... to which there is a hyperlink from [A.1] wikt:obsolesce#Further_reading. For evidence that "obsolete" is a transitive verb, see (B.2 the MANY links from) [B.1] https://www.onelook.com/?w=obsolete
  • 04:1904:19, 28 August 2024 diff hist +333 Talk:Gab (social network)→‎Boycotts after pay policy change: Ask whether this amount of 'waiting' [so far, roughly half a year] is enough time for us to "re-consider" the suggestion from "LonelyBoy2012 (talk)" of "03:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)". That suggestion involved: adding a certain topic -- (so far, identified *only* by the URL of [what is probably] a reliable source) -- "to the history section". By the way, the list of "reliable sources", might be longer, now!
  • 01:2701:27, 28 August 2024 diff hist +4 m HTTP→‎top: At the end of the first paragraph, insert a wikilink pointing to [the article about] "web browser", ... right at the exact place where the phrase "web browser" was already appearing -- (without any hyperlink) -- in the text of that paragraph.
  • 01:1401:14, 28 August 2024 diff hist −1 m Web browser→‎top: UPDATE the sentence that used to say "In 2020, an estimated 4.9 billion people have used a browser.". Since that information is "as of" several years ago, it should be using some kind of past tense. I think this change (Changing "In 2020" to "By 2020", and changing "have used" to "had used"), counts as replacing an instance of the "present perfect" [tense], with an instance of the "past perfect"; or something like that; and it seems appropriate here, since ...the info is not "current".

25 August 2024

22 August 2024

16 August 2024

15 August 2024

  • 23:0023:00, 15 August 2024 diff hist 0 Kamala Harris→‎Attorney General of California (2011–2017): Improve the correctness of the values of the "first [name]" and the "last [name]" fields, [in the "ref" tag] for footnote no. "[113]", by changing "first=Gordon|last=Larry" to "first=Larry|last=Gordon" instead. See the web page at https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-porn-extortion-20140214-story.html [the value of the "url" field in that footnote] for clear evidence that "Larry" was the author's first name, ... NOT the author's last name.

14 August 2024

13 August 2024

9 August 2024

  • 05:0005:00, 9 August 2024 diff hist +123 Batya Friedman→‎top: Correct [or update] the value of the "title" field inside the "<ref>" tag for footnote number "[1]". The character string "iSchool Directory | Information School | University of Washington" might be associated in some way with that web page, (maybe even more so on [the 'access-date'] 2020-10-04 than ... more recently); but obviously, (as of Aug 2024), that web page is about "FACULTY > BATYA FRIEDMAN", so its "title" should be [more like] "Batya Friedman<br/>Professor<br/>batya@uw.edu".
  • 04:2104:21, 9 August 2024 diff hist +3 m Batya Friedman→‎top: RESTORE (or insert) a missing word ("of") (right after the word "School") in the name of the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering. Exhibit A of reliable evidence that the word "of" was left out (or deleted) 'BY MISTAKE' is: the S.R.P. ("search results page") https://www.google.com/search?q=the+Paul+G.+Allen+School+Computer+Science+and+Engineering not only adds that word ["of"] back in, but also: it does NOT even offer you the OPTION of insisting on 'no of' vs. 'of'!

7 August 2024

  • 02:3602:36, 7 August 2024 diff hist 0 m Mount Tambora→‎Chronology of the eruption: Minor SPELLING correction ("stratispheric" --> "stratospheric"). For a reliable "source", see [e.g.], https://www.onelook.com/?w=stratispheric , which says (in part) [QUOTE] : (( "'''''Sorry, no online dictionaries contain the word stratispheric.''''' Did you mean: [https://www.onelook.com/?loc=dmapirel&w=stratospheric stratospheric]" )).

6 August 2024

4 August 2024

  • 17:4917:49, 4 August 2024 diff hist 0 Birth name→‎Maiden and married names: Correct ("Consist" --> "Concise") a TYPO -- (or something; a word that was spelled wrong) in the "title" field of footnote number "[3]" -- a misspelling of the second word of the title Fowler's Concise Dictionary of Modern English Usage. This mistake might well have occurred due to a slip-up involving a not-very-intelligent *** "spell check" *** episode; ... how else to explain a mistake like this, which a human typist would be unlikely to insert "on his own"? current
  • 17:2117:21, 4 August 2024 diff hist +3,360 Judy BlumeAdd a footnote ( <ref name="Rosenfield-Aug-3-2024"/> ) which quotes [see the "QUOTE" field] from an article (by Kat Rosenfield) about Blume's books -- and their relevance, and their obsolescence -- (OR lack thereof) -- and [Kat R.] takes issue, (to some extent), with the conclusions presented in a recent book (by author Rachelle Bergstein) called The Genius of Judy. Of course both Bergstein and Rosenfield (and Blume) are entitled to their opinions, but so are the readers of this article.

31 July 2024

30 July 2024

29 July 2024

  • 09:4209:42, 29 July 2024 diff hist +449 Shulchan Aruch→‎Study resources: Change the entry by the last bullet point, ('List [...] of Ladino words used by the Shulchan Aruch') to use a {{cite web}} template instance, and to include an "archive-url" field, along with some related fields such as "archive-date", and "| url-status = dead <!-- original URL does literally result in a "404 -- Not Found" error message -->".

24 July 2024

  • 06:1906:19, 24 July 2024 diff hist +37 Dido→‎Name: To help clarify how to parse the sentence starting with "It is composed of", re-arrange the displayed rendering of the two noun phrases -- (which are "joined" by the conjunction word "and") -- that appear right after "It is composed of". Also, change << means "fire" >> to << meaning "fire" >>, and, in the sentence beginning with "Other works state [...]", insert one word ("that"), right after "Other works state".

15 July 2024

  • 01:4001:40, 15 July 2024 diff hist −352 m Brooks Brothers riot"Merge" footnote number "[4]" (ref name="Gigot2") with footnote number "[1]" (ref name="Gigot") because they were identical. (They were 100% identical, including the "archive-url" and the "archive-date".) There were already 3 instances of footnote no. "[1]" ("Gigot"), and there was one instance of footnote no. "[4]" ("Gigot2").

12 July 2024

10 July 2024

  • 22:0022:00, 10 July 2024 diff hist +29 Lewis F. Powell Jr.→‎top: Add a wikilink -- (pointing or "linking" to the "#Powell Memorandum, 1971" section of the article) -- right where a sentence mentioning the phrase "1971 Powell Memorandum" was already appearing in the text of the "lede" part of this article. Retain the previously chosen (*displayed*) word order, in accordance with which the year -- ("1971") -- is still displayed before the words "Powell Memorandum".
  • 17:3517:35, 10 July 2024 diff hist +70 Shtetl→‎top: Modify the caption of the first image in this article, to clarify that this image is (a picture of) a painting of a wedding, (as opposed to: a photograph of an actual wedding). Also move the ["artist's credit"] name, "Isaak Asknaziy", closer to the word "painting", to clarify that it is the painting (and not the photograph thereof) that [dates from 1893, and] is being credited to Isaak Asknaziy. Also, add a wikilink cross-reference.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)