Talk:Beechcraft CT-134 Musketeer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beechcraft CT-134 Musketeer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Designation
[edit]It is interesting to note that the official DND history page on the Musketeer refers to its designation as the "CT-134", while the Canadian Forces Technical Order C-12-134-000/MC-000 which is the aircraft's checklist refers to it as the "CT 134" (no dash). - Ahunt (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Every designation that I have looked at on the CF sites use the dash, as do every professionally publised source I have seen. I've heard that the dash is not part of the official designation, but in practice, even the government appears to ignore it! - BillCJ (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- It is funny - I have a large collection of "MC"s (issue checklists) and except for the CT-133 the rest all omit the dash. The rest of the CFTOs are the same way, no dash. The Huey is another oddball checklist, mine says "CH118". It seems that only the PR folks consistently added the dash to make the designations look more American, I suppose. - Ahunt (talk) 23:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Of interest I checked the few copies of the "MB"s that I have (CFTO Aircraft Operating Instructions), which are as official as it gets for aircraft nomenclature and these put the designations as CH136, CH135 and CH118! The most official pub on the designations is in the CFAOs, but the new versions of the designation documents are not publicly available. My conclusion is even the CFTO MC and MBs don't agree, so I don't think it is all that important! - Ahunt (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]Adam, do you have any usable photos of CT-134s? - BillCJ (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- I can check again - the one that is on this page is the best one I had. If I had known in 1981 that I would be helping write an encyclopedia I would have taken more photos! - Ahunt (talk) 23:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have checked again - I only have three and the one already posted here is the only good one I have. - Ahunt (talk) 00:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Operational History
[edit]The only CT134 accident that is mentioned is the one in 1990. When I was in pilot training at Portage in 1982 there was a crash which killed 3 people. It was a familiarization flight not formally part of the training. I can't find any references on it on the web at all...but I was there. I know it happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.86.29.25 (talk)
- There have definitely been a number of other CT-134 accidents, if we can find refs they can be added as per WP:V, otherwise it is all WP:OR. - Ahunt (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
B23 or C23?
[edit]I own a '71 Musketeer. It's designation on the data plate is a C23, not a B23, There's a bit of confusion about that because it's generally thought that the C23 is a Sundowner, but no: the 1971 is indeed designated the C23 Musketeer Custom. In 1972 the left-hand door was made standard, and the name changed to Sundowner
Joe Gerardi (talk) 09:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Joe
- The refs indicate that the CF bought B23s in 1971 and that it was a hasty purchase. I would at all be surpised if they were actually unsold stock from the previous year, which could explain the discrepancy! The ref doesn't actually say they were 1971 models, just that they were bought in 1971, so let me fix that. - Ahunt (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beechcraft CT-134 Musketeer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205231944/http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/v2/equip/hst/musketeer-eng.asp to http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/v2/equip/hst/musketeer-eng.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205231944/http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/v2/equip/hst/musketeer-eng.asp to http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/v2/equip/hst/musketeer-eng.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- B-Class aviation articles
- B-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- B-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles