Jump to content

Talk:Dani Osvaldo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

not sent out because he pretended to machine gun his fans

[edit]

He have scored 3 times for Roma in 5 games! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.162.100.22 (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Daniel osvaldo was not sent out because he pretended to machine-gun his fans after the winning goal against Juventus but for a second yellow card for removing his shirt.

Dr. Vin Ifeme —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.130.76 (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eight or eighteen?

[edit]

In the text it says he scored 8 at Lecce in the box it says he scored 18 which is right? --Thelostlibertine (talk) 11:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pablo Osvaldo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pablo Osvaldo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:OsvaldoP.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:OsvaldoP.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

page name, Pablo Osvaldo

[edit]

Pablo Osvaldo should be the name of the page. He has two names like all the argentinians in Wikipedia, why Pablo Daniel Osvaldo should be the title?--82.61.159.146 (talk) 08:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but my move of the article to this name was reverted. Bearing in mind that this is the English language Wikipedia, the article name should be what he is commonly known by in the English-speaking media. At present, the press are a bit mixed between his full name and the shortened version. I suggest that any further moves of the article should be postponed until the British press decide on what they will call him. The Italian Wikipedia artice is at Pablo Osvaldo, as are the French, Dutch and Polish (amongst others), whereas the Spanish, German, Swedish and others use the full name. Incidentally, as referenced in the article, Southampton FC refer to him as either Daniel or Dani. His Twitter account is also under the name "Dani", so maybe that name will become his accepted name in the English media. Time will tell. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Based on this reasoning, I think it's fair for the page to be moved to Dani Osvaldo now, based on a number of references (almost all UK sources called him Dani after today's match): Metro, Sky Sports (Daniel), Yahoo!, The Sun, Daily Echo, and BBC. Some still calling him Pablo, but Dani certainly seems to be the norm now. Andre666 (talk) 19:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
His name is Pablo Osvaldo. This is an encyclopedia. Just because he's nicknamed Dani doesn't mean that should be the title of the article. How many times does the English media call Messi "Leo", but would we call his article "Leo Messi"? Of course not. Italia2006 (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Daniel OsvaldoDani Osvaldo – Now that he is becoming established in English football, most of the English press refer to him as Dani Osvaldo. For example, after his goal on 28 September, the BBC, The Independent, Scottish Daily Express, The Standard, The Telegraph and The Mirror refer to him as Dani, whereas The Guardian seem confused as to whether to call him Pablo or Daniel. The Southampton official match programme also refers to him as Dani. As explained in the previous thread, his Twitter account is also under the name "Dani". Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC) -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 17 July 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) kennethaw88talk 17:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Dani OsvaldoPablo Daniel Osvaldo – "Dani" is just the diminutive form of "Daniel", not an actual name. The press uses the forms "Pablo Osvaldo", "Daniel Osvaldo" and "Dani Osvaldo", so the full name seems like a logical option. Cambalachero (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Cambalachero (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. – Michael (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dani Osvaldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dani Osvaldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dani Osvaldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]